Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Sony Ericsson S700 discussion
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Sony Ericsson S700 discussion Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 676869 ... 148149150>

randomtask77 Posts: 313

That would be awkward because if you're holding the phone vertically, with the swivel open, the positioning of your hand would have your palm over the camera lens.
--
Posted: 2004-07-05 17:54:40
Edit : Quote

Krubach Posts: > 500

Ok. No pic then!
It seems that the workaround is not an option...

Fer christ sakes! If it's phisically impossible, what do you guys want to do about it?!?!?!? Put two cameras? One in each part?

_________________
Check these coordinates 39°04'51''N/-9°15'14''W here.

[ This Message was edited by: Krubach on 2004-07-05 16:57 ]
--
Posted: 2004-07-05 17:56:59
Edit : Quote

Gud Posts: 207

[quote]
On 2004-07-03 23:25:21, Arne Anka wrote:
Quote:
On 2004-07-03 18:56:37, Gud wrote:
When considering standby- and talk-time, the display resolution should not matter that much. The display should not really be active during a call, and definately not active when testing the standby performance (read: no screensaver etc).

The times presented are probably tested in a lab environment under optimum conditions.



Then why does P900 have 1200 mAh ? Since S700 has a large screen people will most probably use it a lot for other stuff (like K700) than just talking (movies, games, music etc.) and then 780 mAh will be way to small battery in my oppinion. The 700 mAh battery of K700 seem to be a good proof of that.

The reason why the P900 has a battery with higher capacity is most likely because the general power consumption is higher than the S700i.

I fully agree that a 780 mAh battery is too weak for a phone with higher screen resolution than the P900. It might still generate 300 hours of stand-by time in a lab environment, but I fear that the "effective" stand-by time (when using the screen etc) is very low....
--
Posted: 2004-07-05 17:57:49
Edit : Quote

milmino Posts: 454

Does this mean that active usage of the mediaplayer or radio (which i would be really using a lot of) would cause the phone to last about 3 or 4 hours only?
--
Posted: 2004-07-05 19:24:26
Edit : Quote

cmc0 Posts: 34

Quote:
On 2004-07-05 17:54:40, randomtask77 wrote:
That would be awkward because if you're holding the phone vertically, with the swivel open, the positioning of your hand would have your palm over the camera lens.


When I use my phone to take pics, I hold the phone by the side so my hand would'nt cover up the lens. But it's not going to stop me from buying the phone. It's just an incovience for me because I find myself having to send pics to people that are'nt in my phonebook.
--
Posted: 2004-07-05 20:23:21
Edit : Quote

cmc0 Posts: 34

Quote:
On 2004-07-05 17:02:50, Arne Anka wrote:
Quote:
On 2004-07-05 15:51:13, cmc0 wrote:
That sucks. That's a terrible move on SE's part and I hope they fix it for the final firmware.


Why ? What would anyone gain by making photos in open mode ?




Like I said, I may want to send different pics to people that are'nt in my phonebook and it would be inconvient to being forced to open and close the keypad
--
Posted: 2004-07-05 20:32:43
Edit : Quote

cmc0 Posts: 34

Quote:
On 2004-07-05 17:56:59, Krubach wrote:
Ok. No pic then!
It seems that the workaround is not an option...

Fer christ sakes! If it's phisically impossible, what do you guys want to do about it?!?!?!? Put two cameras? One in each part?

_________________
Check these coordinates 39°04'51''N/-9°15'14''W here.

[ This Message was edited by: Krubach on 2004-07-05 16:57 ]


And it's not physically impossible. In fact the S0505i I used in Japan allows you to use the camera with the keypad up or down. when SE decided to release the S700, they must of "magically" disabled this feature

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: cmc0 on 2004-07-05 19:42 ]
--
Posted: 2004-07-05 20:41:24
Edit : Quote

Krubach Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2004-07-05 20:41:24, cmc0 wrote:
And it's not physically impossible. In fact the S0505i I used in Japan allows you to use the camera with the keypad up or down. when SE decided to release the S700, they must of "magically" disabled this feature


I was saying that is physically impossible not to cover the camera lens (grabbing the phone as usual) with your hand.
That's why i gave the idea of, using it's software, flip the pic vertically when the swivel is open, because the lens is in the keypad part and would be inverted. That way the camera wouldn't have to be disabled.

But people started saying: «noooooooo», «that's stupid», «the hand would cover the lens»... hence, my previous post.
--
Posted: 2004-07-06 15:06:12
Edit : Quote

randomtask77 Posts: 313

I don't see anywhere in my previous post where I said "No" and "That would be stupid".

I'm sure that there are enough threads and posts on this forum as well as other forums to find out what you're looking for. The stuff I'm posting about the S700 I got from other threads. I'm just relaying that information. If you don't like this "info" or, you're in denial of accepting it, then I can't help you.
--
Posted: 2004-07-06 17:52:11
Edit : Quote

Krubach Posts: > 500

Ok.
Back to the beginning...

PROBLEM:
No pics when swivel is open. Firmware doesn't allow it.

My suggestion to SE engineers to solve this problem:
Enable the camera always. If the swivel is open, then just invert the pic, flipping it vertically.

You comment to my suggestion:
That would be awkward, because the hand would cover the lens.

My comment to your comment:
No pic then!!!!! Don't do anything, just leave the firmware that way!
Some people need to grab the phone with a full hand!




[EDIT]

Quote:
On 2004-07-06 17:52:11, randomtask77 wrote:
I'm sure that there are enough threads and posts on this forum as well as other forums to find out what you're looking for. The stuff I'm posting about the S700 I got from other threads. I'm just relaying that information. If you don't like this "info" or, you're in denial of accepting it, then I can't help you.



Is this comment intended for me?
I'm not looking for nothing... where did you get that.
I'm not denying anything, i'm just making some suggestions.
I think your nickname suits you well.
Even your posts are random...

_________________
Check these coordinates 39°04'51''N/-9°15'14''W here.

[ This Message was edited by: Krubach on 2004-07-06 17:04 ]
--
Posted: 2004-07-06 17:59:00
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 676869 ... 148149150>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home