>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post your Pictures/Videos taken by C905
Bookmark topic
On 2008-11-25 20:39:36, rippi wrote:
How can i backup my original camdriver on the PC or where can i download it (C905 Camdriver 2.4)?
Than i will test Raderskis driver, because i have used a lot of modded camdrivers on my K800 and the results were great.
Wondering the same mate, I'd like to know that I can go back if anything goes wrong!
--
Posted: 2008-11-26 12:31:24
Edit :
Quote
rippi & chrism_uk
you can find original v2.4 driver here:
http://raider.4shared.com (folder 'experiment')
--
Posted: 2008-11-26 15:40:28
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-11-26 15:40:28, Raiderski wrote:
rippi & chrism_uk
you can find original v2.4 driver here:
http://raider.4shared.com (folder 'experiment')
Which file would I use, camdriver0 origional 2.4 or just camdriver0 ?
--
Posted: 2008-11-26 17:54:15
Edit :
Quote
in sunset time
R1BA034 + Auto
--
Posted: 2008-11-26 18:10:46
Edit :
Quote
chrism_uk
'original' for original and 'camdriver0' for modded
--
Posted: 2008-11-26 20:44:50
Edit :
Quote
Thanx for Raiderski for your driver. I have test it but i can`t see a difference in sharpness
Firmware R1AB0042 / all auto
It`s so sad that at the moment there are no c905-cam-modders like for K850- and k800 phones.
C905 original driver is great, but there are some tiny details wich aren`t perect with original driver:
- sharpness ist too low
- ISO 200 is too high for flash pics (too much noise)
- WB in flash pics sometimes too much yellow
So i hope for great C905 camdriver-mods like Raiderski, Number 1 K800 drivers.
--
Posted: 2008-11-26 22:50:50
Edit :
Quote
I think it can give better sharpness in better light conditions, daylight or any other which won't force too high ISO value (crucial in this case). in low-light high ISO (like 200) degrade details level and sharpening cannot do much
- ISO 200 is too high for flash pics (too much noise)
flash ISO value is based on distance from camera to subject:
- out of macro range = ISO200
- in macro range = ISO100
in fact only weak sharpness need to be really fixed, but it cannot be fully done in camdriver. if you compare pictures from C902 and C905 you will notice that they are totally different:
- C902 have a lot of small details (actually this is subtle noise which create additional sharpness effect)
- C905 is smooth
C902 uses not much smoothing while C905 uses a lot more power to minimize noise. it's very easy to simulate smooth effect on pictures from C902, quick example (left = C905, middle = C902, right = C902 + smooth)
if you want better sharpness in C905, there's no other choice - SE must go back to the roots (C902) or try to reduce noise in different way
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-11-26 23:40 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-27 00:26:41
Edit :
Quote
Can you help k850 users too Raiderski?
--
Posted: 2008-11-27 06:01:08
Edit :
Quote
DarKMaGiCiaN Posts: > 500
@rippi
I agree with Raiderski in all of what he said
"in fact only weak sharpness need to be really fixed, but it cannot be fully done in camdriver"
that why in latest FW the camera is better than the previous one even both FWs are using the same camera driver
--
Posted: 2008-11-27 06:56:10
Edit :
Quote
2 pictures,cloudy day through window
c905
sony cybershot dsc-w5 5mpx
--
Posted: 2008-11-27 15:32:09
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
