>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition
Bookmark topic
On 2013-04-17 17:36:40, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-04-17 17:34:31, randomuser wrote:
Hmmmmmmm. Is that a final retail device ?
Yep, it uses the same display as the Z. Sony is going cheap on the displays to get a bigger margin.
This is the problem with Sony. They think if they slap on some fancy marketing words like "Bravia engine" people wont notice the cheap screens. Samsung is winning because everything in their phones (except build quality
) is top notch. Everything from the screen to nand memory.
And worf, if people choose from two different screens and they are similar but one has a lot better viewing angles they are going to pick that one no matter how "pointless" it is. I think Sony has lost thousands of sales in Sweden alone because of this f**king stupid decision.
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 19:58:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-04-17 19:42:49, worf1000 wrote:
On 2013-04-17 19:37:39, ascariss wrote:
Personally, my fascination with viewing angles has been influenced by owning the S2 and 7.7 tab. For the prices one pays for a Sony product, which is usually comparable to it's competition, the viewing angles should be the same or at lest very close.
Tell me, what is so important about viewing angles? Nobody can tell that stupid hype?
Give some answers.
Like in HDTV's, displays with good viewing angles are regarded as high quality panels. That means that a lot more effort has been put in to produce a panel with good viewing angles while maintaining the quality of the screen as viewed head on. These tradition of characterizing panel quality has gone down to smaller mobile phone panels. So, to put it, display panels with poor viewing angles regardless of how good it is when viewed head on are inferior in quality compared to phone displays with good viewing angles.
Now, it depends on the users on which they prefer. IMO, given how I interact with my phone, I'd prefer one with good viewing angles.
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 20:09:11
Edit :
Quote
Imo the screens of Galaxy S, S3 and S4 are awful pentile panels with color distortion and lack of sharpness. View angles are much less important. HTC's screens last year were the best...
[ This Message was edited by: JoJotaro on 2013-04-17 19:11 ]
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 20:10:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-04-17 17:18:56, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-04-17 16:28:34, randomuser wrote:
On 2013-04-17 16:22:39, ascariss wrote:
Any idea what kind of screen the 7 inch tablet will have? meaning, good viewing angles, will the design be like the larger tablet and the XZ? And is there a scheduled introduction date and date when it will be available for purchase?
Sony tablets have never had viewing angle problem. All Sony tablets have exceptional viewing angles. So that's just a non issue. No other details are available now
Tablet Z does 
[ This Message was edited by: DACHA on 2013-04-17 16:30 ]
Xperia Tablet Z HAS really perfect Screen !
just watch !
http://www.youtube.com/result[....].0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1ac.
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 20:15:42
Edit :
Quote
Xperia Tablet S Jelly Bean update rolling out tomorrow
--
http://www.xperiablog.net/201[....]n-update-rolling-out-tomorrow/
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 20:19:22
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-04-17 19:42:49, worf1000 wrote:
On 2013-04-17 19:37:39, ascariss wrote:
Personally, my fascination with viewing angles has been influenced by owning the S2 and 7.7 tab. For the prices one pays for a Sony product, which is usually comparable to it's competition, the viewing angles should be the same or at lest very close.
Tell me, what is so important about viewing angles? Nobody can tell that stupid hype?
Give some answers.
Higher contrast ratio is the biggest advantage. Higher contrast ratio at oblique angles. Greater colour saturation (i.e things don't look washed out). Greater colour saturation at oblique angles. Lower DeltaE, which is to say, smaller visible shift in colour at an angle. Notice how in a screen with poor viewing angles, the white can shift from white to yellow or blue as you view it from an increasingly oblique angles. Faster panel response times (lower latency).
So generally speaking, display panels with good 178 degree viewing angles, are better in almost every respect. They have better contrast, better colour saturation, lower deltaE and lower latency. So there you have it.
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 20:24:29
Edit :
Quote
To those who don't believe in viewing angles, just watch Amazing Spiderman. I saw that movie last night and of course saw the Xperia phone that Spiderman used. That phone's screen looked like a feature phone screen from 2005 and you know why? Because of the washed out screen from its poor viewing angles. The Xperia Z's screen is a great screen straight on, but it's only great at one angle and average at other angles. A phone with good viewing angles just looks good ALL the time, from almost all angles.
Privacy is a poor excuse for the poor viewing angles, I honestly can't see why people would WANT poor viewing angles. I can understand not MINDING average viewing angles (like it seems most people are with the Z), but to WANT it is borderline insane to me. It's not like you have people next to you all the time to view whatever you're looking at on your phone, it's not like even if you DO have people next to your side (like in the subway) would WANT to look at your phone. So why would you want to sacrifice your screen's quality just for the off chance you need to hide the pr0n you're looking at in the subway?
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 20:54:32
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-04-17 20:54:32, sighduck wrote:
To those who don't believe in viewing angles, just watch Amazing Spiderman. I saw that movie last night and of course saw the Xperia phone that Spiderman used. That phone's screen looked like a feature phone screen from 2005 and you know why? Because of the washed out screen from its poor viewing angles. The Xperia Z's screen is a great screen straight on, but it's only great at one angle and average at other angles. A phone with good viewing angles just looks good ALL the time, from almost all angles.
Privacy is a poor excuse for the poor viewing angles, I honestly can't see why people would WANT poor viewing angles. I can understand not MINDING average viewing angles (like it seems most people are with the Z), but to WANT it is borderline insane to me. It's not like you have people next to you all the time to view whatever you're looking at on your phone, it's not like even if you DO have people next to your side (like in the subway) would WANT to look at your phone. So why would you want to sacrifice your screen's quality just for the off chance you need to hide the pr0n you're looking at in the subway?
Tell me the what is so important about viewing angles, don't change the subject please.
You never see the true colors of the amazing spiderman on your washout colors AMoled hype screen.
Second, this has never to do with viewing angles, so tell me what is so important about viewing angles?
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 21:27:37
Edit :
Quote
I understand people nowadays worrying about Viewing Angle even more than normal seen Straight-On !
-- AT LEAST For me Viewing Angle something Nice to have , But never effect my decision of buying X or Y or Z Phone...
in Short Viewing Angle is just like Wireless Charging , something nice to have ...
[ This Message was edited by: XperiaCute on 2013-04-17 20:31 ]
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 21:28:14
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-04-17 13:49:54, MartenR wrote:
Is it true that Sony's sofrware team working on updates is just 15 people?Some one said this on Xperiablog he says he has chatted with a Sony official on Skype.
I don't remember the actual number, but I read somewhere that Sony Mobile Lund had half the number of people working on updates that Samsung has. Divide that number by the number of phones Sony Mobile has committed to updating versus what Samsung has committed to (hint: Samsung has far less phones to update) and you can see why Sony is always behind. They need to hire more people.
--
Posted: 2013-04-17 21:37:50
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
