>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> OMG! I can't believe my eyes!
Bookmark topic
lol your all so pathetic you argue about grammer and spelling ...
did u know u need not be a retard to notice that spelling is nothing to do with keyboard skills , say if i took the buttons off of your keyboard , you could'nt be accused of being a bad speller , eg:
i take some buttons out of your keyboard:
s0ny er!c$$0n i still win
--
Posted: 2006-10-17 18:31:48
Edit :
Quote
Yes jack but you have to be a retard to interpret it that way. Bad spelling = bad memory = not too clever.
And a keybord is easier to type on that my cell's keypad.
--
Posted: 2006-10-17 18:37:00
Edit :
Quote
She wasnt talking about spelling. She was talking about language construction.
--
Posted: 2006-10-17 18:40:21
Edit :
Quote
Does anyone think the k750i is not a major upgrade other than me of course?
--
Posted: 2006-10-17 19:05:42
Edit :
Quote
Simply put...
With any camera phone or real camera you need to know HOW to take photos to get the best of it. Your pictures taken were quite frankly bad for your own fault.
--
Posted: 2006-10-17 20:16:34
Edit :
Quote
@Xugaa
I agree with you. But the pics on the first post were all taken by the same person and all the pics of w800 seem to score better than those of k800 ones.
I had the chance to use k800 for a few weeks and quite frankly I wasnt all that impressed with it. I am not saying k800 is NO upgrade, but i feel it isnt an upgrade enough (considering its price tag). Few things I found annoying were...
1) The joystick. I was really lookin for an improvement on this since k750 joystick was crappy but was disappointed. I would ve preferred a d-pad like the one on w810 or w550.
2) The sound. The quality is simply unacceptable for a phone of such specs.
3) The menu and overall phone performance is SLOW.
4) The Earphones
Features that are real upgrades
1) The screen
2) 3G . I would ve preferred to see EDGE also. Its mainly for this reason that I am gonna get a w810.
3) The camera. I found the camera better than that of a w800 only at poor light conditions. Otherwise I didnt find much difference. Not to mention, my canon A400 digicam (3.2 MP) performs several times better than a k800 at all conditions.
4) Java platform 7. Lets us run multiple java apps simultaneously. (Although k800 has a huge heap memory, the java apps still perform slow.)
Overall, k800 didnt impress me to the level I had anticipated.
P.S. : Please excuse if my language aint perfect as English is not my mother tongue
--
Posted: 2006-10-17 20:53:34
Edit :
Quote
obviously the cannon camera would be better, since it has a better sensor (CCD) compared to the K800 (CMOS); but then, some digital cameras are bad, even worse than K800.
--
Posted: 2006-10-17 21:49:03
Edit :
Quote
Gees, am I the only one...?!
My K800...
Brilliant pictures, major camera upgrade
Fantastic screen and speed
Excellent sound quality, both ringtones and music
On that last point, my K800 absolutely owns/pwns/kills/destroys/annihlates/fubar's my Ipod Nano!
I just don't get all this negativity...
_________________
The Only Reliable Thing About The Future Is Uncertainty
[ This Message was edited by: Xugaa on 2006-10-17 20:58 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-17 21:58:18
Edit :
Quote
My K800i R1ED001 is SUPER...The best in all. I have produced great pictures with it. Of course, don't compare my photos with pro's...at least they look awesome on my laptop and printable up to 5R.
--
Posted: 2006-10-18 00:32:00
Edit :
Quote
the lens could be dirty. that's whay the pic came out like that. that happended to me with my k750.
here's an example:
--
Posted: 2006-10-18 00:57:28
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
