>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800 camera outperforms N95
Bookmark topic
Here what the author states:
"For my money, the K800 takes better photos in general real world situations - in spite of having 1.8 million fewer photosites on its sensor. The N95 is certainly capable of taking better photos than the K800 when the conditions are right, it just seems that those situations are not as common as one might hope for."
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 21:17:06
Edit :
Quote
see? i'm not the only one who says the k800 outperforms n95, only you ,qvga, are insisting the contrary
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 22:45:29
Edit :
Quote
shanespencer Posts: > 500
It's like being in a kindergarten
--
Posted: 2007-06-10 23:04:34
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-10 23:04:34, shanespencer wrote:
It's like being in a kindergarten
Lol ditto. We've got people fighting over which has the better camera, K800i or N95 lol, when CLEARLY, the K800i has the better camera
And as JuanPablo said earlier in this thread, although it's 3.2mp, it's a better quality 3.2mp camera than the 5mp on N95 hehe!
The QUALITY of the camera is more important, not QUANTITY of pixels
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 07:03:07
Edit :
Quote
Blutarsky - I bet you didnt know that mobileburn uses a pre-production N95 firmware to take those picture. So we can trash that (mobileburn) opinion/conclusion.
--
As of now photos which are
comparable (i.e from phonearena review and from
shanespencer - shots taken of same subject by both phones), it is plain obvious that N95 takes much better photo. I am still waiting for those who said K800 takes better shots to post some comparable shots which show K800 is better.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 08:32:25
Edit :
Quote
totally agree, what i've seen here are standalone K800 shots with no comparable N95 shots. The shots in which N95 and K800 are compared, N95 comes out top, i dont know what the matter with people here, either they are blind or blind in love for SE.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 08:52:10
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 07:03:07, RevoWution wrote
The QUALITY of the camera is more important, not QUANTITY of pixels
This is what some people just can't seem to grasp. Who on earth wants their cam pictures artificial and over-coloured?
QUALITY is what counts.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 09:03:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 09:03:40, goldenface wrote:
On 2007-06-11 07:03:07, RevoWution wrote
The QUALITY of the camera is more important, not QUANTITY of pixels
This is what some people just can't seem to grasp. Who on earth wants their cam pictures artificial and over-coloured?
QUALITY is what counts.
look at the comparison shot posted on the last page and then tell me whats artificial and whats not. nobody here thinks quantity is better than quality.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 09:14:52
Edit :
Quote
I've looked at all of the comparison shots thank you.
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 09:27:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-06-11 09:27:40, goldenface wrote:
I've looked at all of the comparison shots thank you.
and? obviously you might think there was something wrong with K800 there
--
Posted: 2007-06-11 09:36:46
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
