>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K850i today finally I played with it
Bookmark topic
What about the media player?
Does it look like Walkman 2.0?
Note: referring to music player, not media center.
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 00:45:51
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-17 20:11:03, tranced wrote:
. . .
i've seen a few k850 pics taken by sexsex and they look nice
. . .
There's something strange with those photos. Look at
this for example. Bring up the original photo (link above on the right of the photo) and look closely. Like this crop of the cat's left ear:
Notice the 'jaggies'? It's a blow-up of a smaller photo. I suspect that a photo from a K850 was scaled down, and up again. This will hide the corrosive-acid effect of the CMOS noise reduction but will also drop some detail from the photo.
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 06:43:43
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-17 10:54:09, ..:/Ğanny:.. wrote:
Wow - that phone looks so much better in real life
Call me crazy but i think it looks crappier in real life. Not the phone for me.
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 07:33:39
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-19 06:43:43, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2007-08-17 20:11:03, tranced wrote:
. . .
i've seen a few k850 pics taken by sexsex and they look nice
. . .
There's something strange with those photos. Look at
this for example. Bring up the original photo (link above on the right of the photo) and look closely. Like this crop of the cat's left ear:
Notice the 'jaggies'? It's a blow-up of a smaller photo. I suspect that a photo from a K850 was scaled down, and up again. This will hide the corrosive-acid effect of the CMOS noise reduction but will also drop some detail from the photo.
What is with you lot? Sorry not aimed directly at you, it just seems a whole lot of ppl, like a crusade, want to diss ALL SE Camera phones and the quality of pictures they take. ITS A PHONE! it does this FIRST & FOREMOST. Pictures are secondary; just don't loose site of this.
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 08:05:56
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-19 08:05:56, Prom1 wrote:
What is with you lot? Sorry not aimed directly at you, it just seems a whole lot of ppl, like a crusade, want to diss ALL SE Camera phones and the quality of pictures they take. ITS A PHONE! it does this FIRST & FOREMOST. Pictures are secondary; just don't loose site of this.
Two comments:
1. I was just pointing out that someone, probably not sexsexone as the photos he posted popped up early in the
K850 thread after being spotted on a Turkish site, had "fiddled around" with the photos to hide the less than perfect photographic quality of the K850.
2. SE really screwed up with this one. A lot of people, including me, were very disappointed when it turned out that they had put a CMOS sensor in the camera, and not the top-quality
Sony CCD sensor as used in the i-mobile 902. (I recovered from my own disappointment by ordering the i-mobile and am very happy now. At a cost roughly half of the K850's . . . and interestingly the opposite of the K850 in the way the 902 is foremost a camera and the phone part of it is secondary.)
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-08-19 07:33 ]
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 08:29:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-19 06:43:43, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2007-08-17 20:11:03, tranced wrote:
. . .
i've seen a few k850 pics taken by sexsex and they look nice
. . .
There's something strange with those photos. Look at
this for example. Bring up the original photo (link above on the right of the photo) and look closely. Like this crop of the cat's left ear:
Notice the 'jaggies'? It's a blow-up of a smaller photo. I suspect that a photo from a K850 was scaled down, and up again. This will hide the corrosive-acid effect of the CMOS noise reduction but will also drop some detail from the photo.
This picture wasn't taken by K850 Camera!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 11:24:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-19 11:24:20, Pop Lover wrote:
This picture wasn't taken by K850 Camera!!!!!!!!!!!
Ahhh . . . that'd explain why it's quite good. And someone faked the EXIF data.
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 12:20:41
Edit :
Quote
How?
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 12:24:12
Edit :
Quote
@Alexandra,
The EXIF data is not a checksummed, encrypted part of a JPEG file. The data is stored in plain format, easily edited with the appropriate software. admad
posted an example of this at page 53 of the K850 thread.
Just google for "edit exif" if you want to try this yourself.
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-08-19 11:41 ]
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 12:39:00
Edit :
Quote
Whats the video capture like on it? Any chance of a sample.
--
Posted: 2007-08-19 13:37:23
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
