>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K850i vs N95 pic quality
Bookmark topic
I see that most of the SE haters are here.
Is there a reason that you loose so much time in writing how bad SE is?
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 10:54:26
Edit :
Quote
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 12:14:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-28 03:31:26, mib1800 wrote:
On 2007-10-27 23:21:08, NightBlade wrote:
So, you worship phones. Along with they guy that said N95's glorious screen. That's OK with me.
(tell me in case I didn't get the sarcasm)
this coming from someone who said
God, I was amazed that K850's screen had more vivid colours and was twice as bright as N95's.
is really funny.
That association is incorrect.
In the second quote you used, I was just stating the fact that I couldn't believe K850's screen had better quality than N95's in the pic I saw, while in the first I was responding to users, who were exaggerating with the adjectives they used to describe phone screens, in a sarcastic manner.
And no, it's not funny, it's failing to understand english.
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2007-10-29 11:32 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 12:29:01
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-29 12:29:01, NightBlade wrote:
That association is incorrect.
In the second quote you used, I was just stating the fact that I couldn't believe K850's screen had better quality than N95's in the pic I saw, while in the first I was responding to users, who were exaggerating with the adjectives they used to describe phone screens, in a sarcastic manner.
And no, it's not funny, it's failing to understand english.
What's so exagerrating about N95 screen which is about 40% bigger in area than K850?? I tell you what is really exagerrating is the one who praise the K850 screen saying it is twice as bright as N95 when it is not actually so.
http://forums.se-nse.net/index.php?showtopic=11607
(That's sarcasm for you
)
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 13:11:59
Edit :
Quote
same old posts by same old posters
what a thread!
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 13:15:29
Edit :
Quote
all of us should be hapüpy with the fone what we buy. we are all more or less on some way "experts", so we know what we buy. theses are fone cams, dont wait for brill quality, for that take a digi cam. all i wanna say is, that the se vs nokia "war" will be constant always, thats good on some way, cos the brands will maybe recognize what are users after, i mean featurewise mainly, but NOT the cam should be the most important when we take a fone, cos i doubt, that anybody would buy a fone just cos of the cam, when now a days really good digi cams are so cheap...
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 13:20:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-29 13:11:59, mib1800 wrote:
On 2007-10-29 12:29:01, NightBlade wrote:
That association is incorrect.
In the second quote you used, I was just stating the fact that I couldn't believe K850's screen had better quality than N95's in the pic I saw, while in the first I was responding to users, who were exaggerating with the adjectives they used to describe phone screens, in a sarcastic manner.
And no, it's not funny, it's failing to understand english.
What's so exagerrating about N95 screen which is about 40% bigger in area than K850?? I tell you what is really exagerrating is the one who praise the K850 screen saying it is twice as bright as N95 when it is not actually so.
http://forums.se-nse.net/index.php?showtopic=11607
(That's sarcasm for you
)
Well, excuse me, almighty N95i? N95's glorious screen? I mean, how lame is that!?
And I was not exaggerating. I was describing exactly what I saw.
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 13:37:36
Edit :
Quote
n95 screen was a disappointment for me, it would have dserved e60, e70 or at least n80 display... so i have to admit, k850 is better ( more clear )
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 13:40:26
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-26 18:59:00, mario2004 wrote:
You know what - actually I feel sorry for the SE 'fans'. They have a predicament now. Should they raise the alarm/complain and hope SE will do something about the picture quality (especially the flash) or should they 'save face' and praise SE for the beautiful camera flagship device they have created ? udging by the posts, the later seems to be the case - suits me thou -
Wow, not only are you being dogmatic about this make-belief predicament, but now you're implying it's wrong and sad to be an SE 'fan'. What the hell is wrong with you? This is a serious question dude, there's no objectivity to your statements so what is it that you're trying to achieve? Convert everyone into Nokia users like yourself? There's a distinct difference between objective viewpoints that's offered by antagonising individuals such as Dogmann and your pointless (but not necessarily baseless) neverending contempt. That's why no one takes you and your Nokia crusade seriously here, but now you're proving to be more and more of an irritating prick with some sort of sick mission. Please get a life.
On another note, I think which phone performs better is irrelevant here. The mere fact that a dedicated Cybershot phone is even comparable to an almost year-old jack of all trades and master of none N95 is inexcusable & a complete disgrace
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 14:58:02
Edit :
Quote
@Mode - Point taken
and yet something tells me not to care about your post
Never the less, everyone is entitled to a opinion and tx for bothering to reply (with quote and comment) Sorry to have 'irritated' you. I give you a tip - next time IGNORE my post
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 17:28:03
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
