Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot discussion
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot discussion Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 789 ... 606162>

bavlondon2 Posts: > 500

Yeah its dual LED right?
--
Posted: 2008-05-06 13:14:43
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500


On 2008-05-06 11:00:22, dentoters07 wrote:
unless you are taking a picture of something 20-30meters away

Actually, it's more like 3-5m.
--
Posted: 2008-05-06 13:36:07
Edit : Quote

bomber21 Posts: 10

A Greek online shop priced the C702 311 Euros.It is not yet available though.

http://www.play247.gr/index.p[....]turers_id=20&products_id=10212
_________________


[ This Message was edited by: bomber21 on 2008-05-08 11:42 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 12:41:47
Edit : Quote

TimeKiller Posts: 46


I have a k800 and I am looking at this phone to replace my k800.


Well, I also have a K800i however if it "wear's up" or get lost or broken - I will buy another K800i

In my opinion - since K800i, (for the purpose I use the phone - nothing better is offered on the market so far...
--
Posted: 2008-05-09 17:44:51
Edit : Quote

bavlondon2 Posts: > 500

I think GSM Arena mentioned this takes better pics than the k810. However its lacking in xenon flash.
--
Posted: 2008-05-09 23:07:52
Edit : Quote

bomber21 Posts: 10

C702 info on FCC's site

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oet[....]=507506&fcc_id='PY7A3052081'

SAR Value:1.27
--
Posted: 2008-05-11 18:47:20
Edit : Quote

Radiux399 Posts: 246

Well, Mobile review has the C702 review up. Its only in Russian for now, but the pictures speak for themselves...

Review:
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-c702.shtml

Sample Pics:

http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]onyeric/c702/photo/photo02.jpg
http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]onyeric/c702/photo/photo03.jpg
http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]onyeric/c702/photo/photo05.jpg
http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]onyeric/c702/photo/photo06.jpg

More can be found in the review...

Overall i'd have to say i'm disappointed. The quality is certainly below that of the now 2 year old K800. There is a LOT of noise and noise reduction going on, so much that it starts to affect the sharpness of the picture. Even in bright outdoor lighting the subjects start to look smeared. The colors don't look all that great either (too cool and unsaturated, just like K850), and highlights look overblown. Purple fringing makes a comeback yet again.

I was really looking forward to this handset, but I guess I might have to pass on it until SE figures out how to put a quality camera sensor back in their phone.

[ This Message was edited by: Radiux399 on 2008-05-15 01:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-15 02:45:41
Edit : Quote

bronxdude Posts: > 500

^^ guess I have to read it in english first. =)
--
Posted: 2008-05-15 04:27:24
Edit : Quote

F-Lexx Posts: 163

Or you could use online translation

http://babelfish.yahoo.com/tr[....]ml&lp=ru_en&btnTrUrl=Translate
--
Posted: 2008-05-15 15:17:27
Edit : Quote

F-Lexx Posts: 163

Yup, the picture quality is quite bad, at 3 MP... There's noise even on the sky in some photos! And the edges of objects are too jagged... I don't think it can compare to the K800i.
--
Posted: 2008-05-15 15:31:28
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 789 ... 606162>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home