>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson C905 VS Samsung i8510?
Bookmark topic
The night shots are pathetic to say the least.
Anyways, geat outdoor shots.But I still vouch for the C905 sharpness.The C905 has much better indoor shots.
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 07:15:10
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-06 07:15:10, se_dude wrote:
The C905 has much better indoor shots.
Agree.
C905 comes to surprise me that it doesn't have the oil painting feeling that K850/C902 have (a lot of it) when shooting indoors.
INNOV owns the outdoor shots though. But indoor shots have too much noise reduction and lost the details.
_________________
Feel free to visit my art gallery.
Macheli @DeviantArt
Where has the old time Esato gone, where reviews were balanced and reliable? *sigh*
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-08-06 06:21 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 07:20:03
Edit :
Quote
macro
http://mobile-review.com/revi[....]/camera/macro/high/photo02.jpg
http://mobile-review.com/revi[....]/camera/macro/high/photo05.jpg
Seen much better shots.
Night shots
http://mobile-review.com/revi[....]/camera/macro/high/photo05.jpg
This was in a light source but all blurry.
http://mobile-review.com/revi[....]/camera/night/high/photo05.jpg
But some good shots too.
Good camera. C905 has better macro,low light and indoor shots.
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 07:23:35
Edit :
Quote
the good thing i feel about c905 is that it seems not to use too hard post-processing/noise reduction anymore, such as in k850/c902. so i can say that pics produced by c905 is more "raw", "untouched", like the old SE. they have grainy looks, but details are there, and also the oil painting effects are minimal, even in low light. it's such a good news actually after suffering a lots of details loss from previous Cybershot series.
however.. the colors are still a bit wrong, and seem washed out. but as long as details are maintained, i think it's not really hard to make a good and sharp pictures with c905, with post editing in PC to strengthen the quality of its color reproduction. (pc editing will be a lot easier and more possible when the images are rawer, and still producing well-detailed pics)
_________________
Feel free to visit my art gallery.
Macheli @DeviantArt
Where has the old time Esato gone, where reviews were balanced and reliable? *sigh*
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-08-06 06:59 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-08-06 07:01 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 07:58:34
Edit :
Quote
Amras, are you talking about. C902 looks oilpaint indoor ???
does this looks like some god damn oil paint. (so tired of some people who give this judgements... (open your eyes for the love of god)
and how do you mean that BOTH k850 and C902 uses same post-processing/noise reduction... its quite big different between k850 & c902, their balance between noise and colors-saturation has been improved quite much.
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-06 09:56 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 10:27:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-06 10:27:20, plankgatan wrote:
and how do you mean that BOTH k850 and C902 uses same post-processing/noise reduction... its quite big different between k850 & c902, their balance between noise and colors-saturation has been improved quite much.
Post (a link to) the whole photo next time if you want to show us the quality of the noise reduction. Scaling down photos hides this.
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 10:59:13
Edit :
Quote
man. i have post many full size... search a bit and you will find.
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 11:06:46
Edit :
Quote
its quite big different between k850 & c902, their balance between noise and colors-saturation has been improved quite much.
show us difference because I don't see nothing else than better color reproduction. what a freaky thing is noise - colors balance? ah, ok I know it's something like zoom - contrast balance
man. i have post many full size...
most of pictures are 1024x768, don't call them full size. silly but real full size pics are those which are good enough to post them in full size
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 11:46:15
Edit :
Quote
Mobile-review just posted preview about 8510i camera with compression between it and canon digital camera and some more picture and impressions:
http://www.mobile-review.com/review/samsung-innov8-camera.shtml
(in russian)
just look at its nights shots, blurred and overall bad quality.
disappoint...
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 11:58:41
Edit :
Quote
Raiderski & Abu..... how in hell can you even complain about this ?????
(you must have a really boring life or something. maybe you should start to have more SEX...i dont know)
i post full size whenever i want.
and yes, i HAVE post several full size pics... jävla bondläpp
and yes, C902 color-reproduction has been improved, even the noise, but not as much as the color-repr.
must i really find them for you:
hell, even low light looks OK in full size:
AND THERE YOU HAVE IT. K850 DIDNT MANAGE THIS KIND OF POST PROCESSING IN LESS LIGHT.. ... do you understand my point now or what ????
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-06 11:14 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-06 12:00:31
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
