>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800 vs C902 pictures please
Bookmark topic
@plank:
even with the C902's physical sensor size being larger than K800, C902's unit cell size is smaller than K800 thus, more chances of pixel errors produced
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 09:15:29
Edit :
Quote
what i mean with C902 shows better details, is this:
watch the leafs and everything else in the background... (the background stays sharp & real even that the camera focus on the "object") ... there you have C902 strongest side.
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-24 09:03 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 10:02:50
Edit :
Quote
this pic is not even a close to low-light. I proved this on previous page. we are still waiting for really low-light and night pics in full size by C902. dear user of C902 don't be shy
we (users of K800) are not...
original driver
modded driver (the best example to show how hardware is limited by firmware)
Plank was using original driver in his K800. I understand why he don't like K800 pics
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 10:24:05
Edit :
Quote
first of all. what have modded k800 software to with this thread ???? (once again you bounce away off topic)
i know for sure that a K800 or a K810 never will have the same details & lightness as a picture like this, it nothing for nothing that one of the largest Europeen digital magazin gave C902 10 of 10 points..or ???
or like this
C902 is little better on everything, except for long distance Flash pics.....
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-24 09:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 10:30:53
Edit :
Quote
off topic? why modded? any why not? are we talking about pictures quality or not? why I can't post pics to show everyone that K800 can take nice pics in weak light? you don't like modded driver because it improves quality and this is inconvenient fact for your C902, silly
i know for sure that a K800 or a K810 never will have the same details & lightness as a picture like this
1. LOL
2. for sure even Nikon D3 "never will have the same..."
3. I know for sure that there is a life in space
4. did you already propose this "low-light" photography in order to add to this list:
http://tnij.org/bo2b ?
5. "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it"
C902 is little better on everything
only "a little"? good news, previously I thought it is killing K800. to be honest, I hate xenon - do you want my flash lamp? I will take your LED
ok, I know I know "...never will have the same details & lightness..." but I'm only posting this pic
EDIT:
can we finally see night pic (something like ISO400 1/8s) in full size?
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-24 10:18 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 11:06:34
Edit :
Quote
another ugly pic from K800, remember guys "it never will have the same details & lightness like from C902"
ok... bye bye thread
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-24 10:17 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 11:16:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-24 00:40:57, Raiderski wrote:
do you remember hot pixels (red, green, blue) on K800 pics when ISO is growing up? well, ISO500 picture from C902 don't have this pixels, can we open the champagne now? hold on, there is also chroma noise on both pics which is quite normal, level of this noise on both pictures seems to be identical. C902 is more sensitive on red/pink color (more noise) while K800 sensitivity seems to be identical on all colors
ok, at least C902 don't have hot pixels to ISO500, this is good improvement! everything else doesn't matter for now
The hot pixels didnt disappear
by magic, the c902 has much more powerful noise reduction sure theres no hot pixels but alot more detail has been lost id rather have the hot pixels.
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 12:02:22
Edit :
Quote
@Raidersky:
Just a question to ask, how is K800 with a modded camdriver in terms of low light details? i hope the nasty N-R on original driver was at least minimized
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 12:57:02
Edit :
Quote
razec
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=170579&start=1365
there is a post for you
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 13:28:54
Edit :
Quote
about details & lightness....
try this with your K800/K810
edit. Raderski... sunset pictures is nothing hard for a cell phone to handle. its enough with light to get good quality even with a K700.
try instead some indoor pictures with some simple lamps who shines, then you really see if the camera handle low light good or bad.
(ps... dont get me wrong. i love k800/K810 picture quality, i just love C902 quality little more
)
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-24 12:58 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-24 13:43:43
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
