>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> C901 vs C902 camera quality
Bookmark topic
On 2009-09-05 04:05:04, mrjulius wrote:
@code
i thought sniper is on indonesia
because my sniper parts are made in Indonesia
maybe they change the name after delivered it in philippines
c902
led also have disadvantage in macro over exposure in light
and that its only disadvantage?
take another look at the pics above, hahahhaha
--
Posted: 2009-09-05 04:41:51
Edit :
Quote
there's no good in low light in C902
--
Posted: 2009-09-05 05:43:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-09-04 11:25:50, code28h4p wrote:
and note...there's no one mod camdriver has been released...so it was pure stock camdriver...
i wanna go out somewhere to found nice spot to take with my sweet pinky Filippa....
i juz want to asking here, why must use moded cam driver???y not used original cam driver..
@code, here my ym
address..fahmi_cool323@yahoo.com
add me yeah..i wanna asking u alot..
--
Posted: 2009-09-28 12:22:29
Edit :
Quote
C902 had advantage over lowlight macro.
But I think C901 also performs well in lowlight macro given that the subject isnt reflective/shiny..
Also, there are many ways of reducing xenon reflections, like always take a picture of tilted even surface, (dont let it parallel to the phone)
The smart contrast is also a nice feature, provided you "know" when is the suitable time to use it.
without smart contrast
with smart contrast on.
[ This Message was edited by: thesun on 2009-09-28 13:42 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-28 14:33:18
Edit :
Quote
@thesun
Looks like smart contrast isn't so smart after all. It should know the suitable contrast since it's supposed to be 'smart' eh? I guess the rule of thumb is if it ain't broken, don't fix it
[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2009-09-28 13:43 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-28 14:41:45
Edit :
Quote
i had a video of that fountain. will upload it to youtube later..
hahaha.. you can find it at Hentian Sungai Perak PLUS Highway..
The black balls in real life are actually not so dark,
You can see their shadows.. so black...
In the dark area, the smart contrast perform quite well, while in the bright area, it's abit cartoonish..
I guess we can't expect more from a cheap cam like this rite..
I had other pics with smart contrast, but all of them had cartoon look
--
Posted: 2009-09-28 14:50:11
Edit :
Quote
this is a normal shot, (non smartcontrast) from another view.
look at the balls' or spheres' color and shadow,
they are much closer to the one with smartcontrast picture before.
[ This Message was edited by: thesun on 2009-09-28 13:59 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-28 14:58:49
Edit :
Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jp-UOYGDXWY
--
Posted: 2009-09-28 17:56:37
Edit :
Quote
from my own experience with c901 and c902.................
¤ c901 produce better red colours, especially indoor.....(however, green, blue looks sometimes(often) cartoonish with c901)
¤ c901 have a bit less noise in fullsize, (for you who think thats super-important)
c902 take better macro, (better colours, more realistic)
c902 produce overall more stable shoots, (more accurate white balance....and so on).
-----------------------------------------------------
by the way...........
think C902 doing pretty well
(colour-wise it didnt fell so much after (top-notch)Nikon D80....which explain quite a lot i guess)
c902
D80
------------------------------------------------------
c902
D80
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c902
D80
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-09-28 22:30 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-28 23:05:23
Edit :
Quote
And why post a comparison between c902 vs d-80?(and iso 200+f.9,0 for a close-up with THAT Nikon?I have sure you can do it better...)
--
Posted: 2009-09-29 04:46:40
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
