>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
On 2012-07-05 06:44:44, Guarulhos wrote:
Exaflare23...
I Fully Agree !
Nothing Of The Subject Advance To Own a Ferrari, If The Person Concerned Has No License To Drive !!!
The Same Situation Turns With Cameraphones And Digital Cameras, Nothing Of The Best Equipment Advance If the User In Question Do Not Have Any Photo Knowledge !
I've Visualized Amazing Images... Quality Unquestionable Taken With The Xperia Arc And Xperia Neo (Bad Camerafones), As I've Seen Pictures With Bad Quality... Incidentally Captured By Lousy Nokia NSeries N8 And The Apple IPhone 4S (Marvelous Cameraphones) !
Everything is Very Subjective Yes, But in 95% Of Cases, The Photos Taken With Cameraphones Top Of The Line Of Nokia (808 PUREVIEW And NSERIES N8) Will Be Better Than The Images Captured By All Other Cell Phone Companies (SAMSUNG, SONY, APPLE, LG, HTC And Etc...) !
And It Turns On Account 2 Specific Reasons:
1º While Sony... Samsung... Apple... Other Manufacturers And Cameraphones They Add In His Image Sensor Size Of A Lump Of Olive, Nokia Smartphones His Team Top Line Image Sensors With Gigantic, 6 Times In Middle Of Greater Than The Competition And Two Times Higher Than The Integrated Digital Compact Cameras !!!
2º While Sony... Samsung... Apple... HTC And Other Manufacturers They Add Lenses Made Of Plastic... The Nokia Devices Top Line Your With Crystal Lens !!!
Got It ??? Add Nothing More !!!
P.S: As For His Question... My Choice Is The Second Picture !!!
Very good choice, second picture was taken by c901 and 1st one was taken by Pureview 808
[ This Message was edited by: exaflare23 on 2012-07-05 06:23 ]
--
Posted: 2012-07-05 07:17:58
Edit :
Quote
had a very good laugh
95% Top Of The Line Of Nokia (808 PUREVIEW And NSERIES N8) Will Be Better Than The Images Captured By All Other Cell Phone Companies
was just blown away by this example
and he himself proved it by choosing letter B
the point is clear though, photo quality also greatly relies on the photographer. When photos are downsized to a size that is commonly used for printing 4x6 photos or for facebook sharing, the difference in details is almost negligible not unless the camera is truly horrible which in contrast most cameraphones today produce decent to good image quality. Which is why consumers look for a balanced capability when considering buying mobile phones.
[ This Message was edited by: reeflotz on 2012-07-05 11:38 ]
--
Posted: 2012-07-05 12:21:50
Edit :
Quote
I'm so speechless with this,
there's no question that PureView is the best cameraphone, but "photography" is not handled by the camera, it's the user that does that. the camera is just the medium. thanks for making my day fellow kabayans!
my advice to you exaflare is to post a link for their original output in this thread, as he might not believe what you just said
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2012-07-05 12:01 ]
--
Posted: 2012-07-05 12:57:33
Edit :
Quote
Well yea it's true who is behind the lens. I before have managed to get the best out of a poor camera phone as I know how to
--
Posted: 2012-07-05 15:07:00
Edit :
Quote
@razec
ok here's your request
Picture A (Pureview 808)
http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/6223/201206150057.jpg
EXIF
Picture B (C901)
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]on/c901/201206161256Q1fzC6.jpg
EXIF[ This Message was edited by: exaflare23 on 2012-07-08 15:10 ]
--
Posted: 2012-07-08 16:08:46
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-07-05 12:57:33, razec wrote:
I'm so speechless with this,
there's no question that PureView is the best cameraphone, but "photography" is not handled by the camera, it's the user that does that. the camera is just the medium. thanks for making my day fellow kabayans!
my advice to you exaflare is to post a link for their original output in this thread, as he might not believe what you just said
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2012-07-05 12:01 ]
So you're saying that if you buy a £5000 semi-pro DSLR kit, then all the photos you take will be at semi- proffesional standard?
--
Posted: 2012-07-08 16:20:58
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-07-08 16:20:58, mriley wrote:
On 2012-07-05 12:57:33, razec wrote:
I'm so speechless with this,
there's no question that PureView is the best cameraphone, but "photography" is not handled by the camera, it's the user that does that. the camera is just the medium. thanks for making my day fellow kabayans!
my advice to you exaflare is to post a link for their original output in this thread, as he might not believe what you just said
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2012-07-05 12:01 ]
So you're saying that if you buy a £5000 semi-pro DSLR kit, then all the photos you take will be at semi- proffesional standard?
Eh... What exactly are trying to imply? Of course in order to make good photography, It needs both proper skills and equipment... a DLSR can produce crap pictures when used by an inexperienced P&S user, and a pro-user can "barely" produce the results he wanted without the proper imaging capabilities he needed. don't just take any of my words literally and use it against me
that suddenly reminded me of a good friend that's no longer in touch with us in this forum at least
Maybe because I forgot to add "just" between the "not" and "handled" on my first paragraph that's why you're burning me now
--
Posted: 2012-07-08 16:37:20
Edit :
Quote
Oh thank god
i thought you were agreeing with Guarulhos for a moment
--
Posted: 2012-07-08 17:57:02
Edit :
Quote
here are two short video clips from mine, if anyone is interested in the quality without the youtube compression
http://www.mediafire.com/?yf5qbs1ne805s8r
--
Posted: 2012-07-16 12:26:49
Edit :
Quote
Wow, the quality is simply great. I didn't knew it was this good. I really hope to see this cam in more phones (would be an overkill with Android
)
--
Posted: 2012-07-16 20:22:26
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
