Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : K750i Vs. S700i photo comparison. Check this out, guys.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K750i Vs. S700i photo comparison. Check this out, guys.
Bookmark topic
Nice pictures numb... but i was wandering... if u guys were to take pictures at night... does it appear snowy?
--
Posted: 2005-07-17 06:38:23
Edit :
Quote
great pictures numb... wat is ur firmware?
--
Posted: 2005-07-17 06:53:39
Edit :
Quote
Very nice pic numb..like usual...
Nice pic of Sweden and nice clear photos..
_________________
Fan of S E
K750i-P900-V800
Proximus,be
member aswell of a French SE forum:
http://www.planete-se.net[ This Message was edited by: staline on 2005-07-17 06:27 ]
--
Posted: 2005-07-17 07:26:40
Edit :
Quote
thx
#Reo
I really like your 11th september picture
I took the liberty of adjusting the colors of the Corn dog image to show that when a picture has the sharpness of the S700, but just have a colorproblem, often it can be fixed in an imageeditor. Therefore the S700 can still hold its grounds in many respects.
Original:
Adjusted:
--
Posted: 2005-07-17 13:11:04
Edit :
Quote
@numb
WOW!!!
The white really comes out where it should and the overall picture is brighter making the colors stand out in richer form. Nice job !
What program and version was used?
--
Posted: 2005-07-17 18:56:01
Edit :
Quote
Yeah, looks really good now
Used Photoshop (allways do), wasnt really difficult, simply set the whitepoint and blackpoint manually under levels then the rest of the colors came to live. Basically the picture wasnt really poor, it was a wrong description of me to use in my first post about the picture, the picture has the sharpness and the colorinformation it needs, only problem was the camera had selected a wrong whitepoint giving the blueish tint. Correcting that whitepoint (and blackpoint to give the full range of levels) in Photoshop was all that was needed.
1. open the image in photoshop (or similar imageeditor)
2. under image adjustments, select the levels tool
3. in the levels tool, select the white point selector and click on the part of the image one thinks should be the whitest spot
4. in the levels tool, select the black point selector and click on the part of the image one thinks should be the black spot (the black text)
And voila, almost perfect picture.
Naturally this is only possible because the picture taken by the S700 is basically good, except for the misjudgement of the white point. Using manual settings and spot photometry when taking the picture, it propably would have been able to determine white point better.
Allthough the determination of white point can be a weekpoint when using autosettings on the S700, its still not enough to make it a poor cam, because its fixable. The problems you see in most other 1.3mp mobilecams are not fixable, and thus I still think the S700 are by far the best 1.3mp mobile cam on the market.
[ This Message was edited by: numb on 2005-07-17 21:13 ]
--
Posted: 2005-07-17 22:11:47
Edit :
Quote
@numb
Thanks for the pointers.
There are some pics I have of my kids, which are good pics but can be turned from good to great with a bit of adjustment.
--
Posted: 2005-07-17 23:16:35
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-07-17 03:36:05, davidsic wrote:
No, you're not right. The K750i is simply better than the S700i.
Yes, we know that, duh !
But i am right when i say that picture you took with the S700i is a poor one - not the cameras fault but the person taking the picture.
The S700i has proved its capable of taking pictures much better than that poor effort.
--
Posted: 2005-07-18 00:07:17
Edit :
Quote
Yeah nice pics but i don't believe if you didn't apply USM or Smart Sharpen (PS CS).
Look at these pictures below,
Before tweaked :
After tweaked :
Before :
After :
'It's not the camera, it's the man'
--
Posted: 2005-07-18 00:42:42
Edit :
Quote
#dkessel
Not sure which pictures you mean or what you dont beleive, but personally I never use any sharpening tools on my digicam or mobilecam pictures. I find it most of the times just ruins the pictures. Make them look unnatural. If its not sharp enough in itself, then I simply dont use it.
The only tools I ever use to correct cam pictures, are those needed to fix a colortint of some sort, and very occasionally a very light noisefilter. But mostly I prefer not to touch them at all or only very litle, want to keep it as close to the original as possible.
The samples in this thread were untouched except for the resizing.
I do get as many "poor" shots as I get good shots with my cams, cause no cam is perfect (and neither is the photographer), but the "poor" shots I just throw away, and focus on the good ones. I also ususally take several shots of the same, and then just keep the best.
--
Posted: 2005-07-18 01:26:59
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
