Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : C905 Cybershot Xperience v 7.5
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> C905 Cybershot Xperience v 7.5
Bookmark topic
On 2010-08-03 19:41:27, NEO1981 wrote:
@jake
i ve noticed that ,thanks,and the other thing is that the other camdrivers,like eltoffers's,produce a more heavier pictures,i think i would like that witchking do this in his camdriver,i really like having heavier pictures,maybe im wrong but mi idea is that if the picture results heavier its because its has more details,and thats why is heavier.
what do you yhink guys????
i remember taking a picture around 6 mb in 8 mpx with the last camdriver that eltoffer made.
that only a request,but i want your opinions.
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-03 18:42 ]
I just went back and checked and the buffer size, and it was actually smaller in eltoffer's driver than what our current witchking beta edited driver is.. i do not remember taking 6mb shots either. maybe my memory just bad
--
Posted: 2010-08-03 22:29:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2010-08-03 22:29:13, jake20 wrote:
On 2010-08-03 19:41:27, NEO1981 wrote:
@jake
i ve noticed that ,thanks,and the other thing is that the other camdrivers,like eltoffers's,produce a more heavier pictures,i think i would like that witchking do this in his camdriver,i really like having heavier pictures,maybe im wrong but mi idea is that if the picture results heavier its because its has more details,and thats why is heavier.
what do you yhink guys????
i remember taking a picture around 6 mb in 8 mpx with the last camdriver that eltoffer made.
that only a request,but i want your opinions.
I just went back and checked and the buffer size, and it was actually smaller in eltoffer's driver than what our current witchking beta edited driver is.. i do not remember taking 6mb shots either. maybe my memory just bad
I think i have a backup of that picture,let me see if i can find it and upload it in a imagehost,but trust me it was near 6 mb and the details were awesome,an well the conditions made that picture possible beacuse it were good sunlight,and the light conditions made it,let me search on my pc,wait please.
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-03 21:41 ]
--
Posted: 2010-08-03 22:39:48
Edit :
Quote
regarding bigger buffer size...
On 2009-09-30 19:11:43, eltoffer wrote:
to give some support to riderski comments, here is a pic 100% crop from these 2 drivers dm3.5 and mine 3.9, i cant notice any difference just a little on SHARPNESS but this is not due QUANTIZATION TABLE values just SHARPNESS, DM has 8 and mine has 4
BTW notice size pic is almost DOUBLE but it doesnt affet at all on image quality, thats why i didnt set a higher buffer size, i rather have more spce to music videos and photos than waste space for nothing at least nothing notable for my eyes
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2009-09-30 18:19 ]
--
Posted: 2010-08-03 23:08:09
Edit :
Quote
I did not found that picture but i have one in 8 mpx and its size is over 3 mb and im not telling lies i will proove it usig EXIF.
look at the colors and details of the grass,i think it was taken with the eltoffer's camdriver 3.6 i did not remember.
direct link:
http://h.imagehost.org/view/0359/DSC00262
exif details:
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-03 22:29 ]
--
Posted: 2010-08-03 23:25:10
Edit :
Quote
I am getting over 5mb file sizes right now on 8mp setting.. it all depends on the scene you are shooting
--
Posted: 2010-08-03 23:35:18
Edit :
Quote
i agree but that picture was all in auto with a modded camdriver,just a bit of moddification,not all the settings that witchking put it in this new camdriver,and got 6 mb,and the picture i posted before it really was with eltoffer's 3.6.
my question here is why we cant have that kind of picture in terms of mb????? i dont care about the memory,i got an 16g m2 card.
but well that only my opinion,lets see what the real master witchinkg has to say.
I apologize if im being rude or something,but i liked that big sized pictures,cause i have a 8 mpx camera,well i got to go to work.
--
Posted: 2010-08-03 23:50:48
Edit :
Quote
@NEO
I have seen many pictures with smaller file sizes that also show good details also.
Just because you have one single picture that looks good, doesn't mean a larger file size is necessarily better, especially when you have seen witchking, as well as eltoffer tell you that there is not enough of a difference once you get over 2-3mb to justify the larger file size.
why don't you perform a comparison if you want to prove your case so bad.
load an old eltoffer or dm3.8 driver, take a few 8mp shots, then load withckings latest beta, and shoot the same scenes.. and compare the pictures and 100% crops.
This way you can prove that the bigger file size really shows more details
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2010-08-04 03:57 ]
--
Posted: 2010-08-04 00:40:31
Edit :
Quote
What are you talking about?
--
Posted: 2010-08-04 00:58:19
Edit :
Quote
Sir how to know if the camera driver is correctly installed to my phone?
--
Posted: 2010-08-04 05:54:10
Edit :
Quote
@ALL
now i remember,that picture i was talking about was taken with cybershot xperience 4.1,please forgive all of you,back then i was uisng eltoffer's camdriver and i saw cybershot xperience 4.1 posted in se-planet,so i gave it a try and i liked,thats why im here,because i found the real source where the camdriver was posted originally.
Again,I apologize.
greetings to all.
[ This Message was edited by: NEO1981 on 2010-08-04 05:24 ]
--
Posted: 2010-08-04 06:20:16
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
