>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
sonysta I think you might be right man.. we will have to wait for at least another 12 months before we get a real 808 replacement. The more I see from the 1020 the more I think that it isn't it..
Anyway, here I just took this with the 808 for this post
nd filter off, sharpness to +5, 95% jpeg compression, everything else on auto.
sharp enough ?
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5486/9446340971_39b9d9e5a6_o.jpg
I can get it even sharper if I play around with the contrast and white balance a bit. I think when people say that the 1020 produces sharper images they are confusing edge sharpening with actual "sharpness"
So.. I really like Steve and I appreciate all his work over the years, but that little comp of his is BS for the most part.
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-08-06 03:11 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-06 04:09:00
Edit :
Quote
Thanks for the quote !
Actually I think like you, to replace our 808 only in the next generation (which it seems will come in
February 2015), 808 there will continue to be king of the image, I think the biggest difference is restricted in the 1020
recording videos !
--
Posted: 2013-08-06 08:00:35
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-08-06 04:09:00, cu015170 wrote:
sonysta I think you might be right man.. we will have to wait for at least another 12 months before we get a real 808 replacement. The more I see from the 1020 the more I think that it isn't it..
Anyway, here I just took this with the 808 for this post
nd filter off, sharpness to +5, 95% jpeg compression, everything else on auto.
sharp enough ?
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5486/9446340971_39b9d9e5a6_o.jpg
I can get it even sharper if I play around with the contrast and white balance a bit. I think when people say that the 1020 produces sharper images they are confusing edge sharpening with actual "sharpness"
So.. I really like Steve and I appreciate all his work over the years, but that little comp of his is BS for the most part.
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-08-06 03:11 ]
I don't know what kind of magic 808 uses but it's photos are just amazing! 1020 just does not come close.
As for the next generation, I would not hold my hopes up, it seems Nokia really likes the terrible algorithms they have on WP. Unless they fix that and make it as good as Symbian's all Lumias will be bad.
If they fix it, then there is the hardware and sensor size issue. 1020's successor should come faster than 2015, I'd say 2014, as Lumia 1025 and if it does not have a 1" sensor, ND Filter and other goodies they might as well not bother.
--
Posted: 2013-08-06 23:09:12
Edit :
Quote
The magic was in the idea and the realization of it.. the actual thing is just a very good sensor, solid jpeg processing, and very.. very well engineered optics from CZ, or in other words.. recipe for good imaging.
The 1020 is good, its just not as good as the 808.
A 1" sensor would be very nice, but the phone will be a fatty..
--
Posted: 2013-08-07 04:11:53
Edit :
Quote
Nokia usually performs an upgrade on your cameraphone "flagship" 18 in 18 months, at least that's what happened to the N95 the N82, the N82 to N86, the N86 to the N8, the N8 for the 808 and now the 808 to 1020 !
So the guess of February 2015 for the next big Nokia cameraphone !
--
Posted: 2013-08-07 08:00:42
Edit :
Quote
I think it is something utopian sensor 1" !
In my opinion hardly a cell phone will be launched with a larger sensor integrated in the 808 "True Pureview" !
A BSI Sensor 2/3", OIS, Zeiss Lens (f/2.0), ND Filter, Xenon Flash and Postprocessing Pureview (Phase 1) would be the ideal successor for the big 808 "True Pureview" !!!
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-08-07 07:13 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-07 08:11:25
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-08-07 04:11:53, cu015170 wrote:
The magic was in the idea and the realization of it.. the actual thing is just a very good sensor, solid jpeg processing, and very.. very well engineered optics from CZ, or in other words.. recipe for good imaging.
The 1020 is good, its just not as good as the 808.
A 1" sensor would be very nice, but the phone will be a fatty..
It won't be that fat, but it will be the best cameraphone on the market. And I'd gladly accept a bit of a width increase for the a much better camera, it'll still be smaller than carrying around a phone AND a P&S.
--
Posted: 2013-08-07 22:20:28
Edit :
Quote
Patriotic Pureview 808 by
Frankie Bloise, on Flickr
--
Posted: 2013-08-10 12:03:28
Edit :
Quote
TBH I didn't like the 925 camera at all. The size might be perfect for a Lumia, but still left me wanting more from the Camera plus no HDMI out..
IMG_00001613 by
Frankie Bloise, on Flickr
--
Posted: 2013-08-10 12:07:29
Edit :
Quote
First Comparison For PureviewClub: Nokia 808 PureView Vs Lumia 1020 Pureview – Several Shots In a Small Harbour!
http://pureviewclub.com/2013/15880/comment-page-1#comment-20784
P.S: Well, what you’ve shown in these images was just what I had seen in other comparative, ie, 808 offers the best photographic results 1020 (including full resolution) !
In all images 808 delivers images with greater detail, colors more realistic and less noise… And this is particularly evident in images 3, 5 and 6 !
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-08-11 19:25 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-11 20:25:34
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
