Esato Mobile
General discussions : Rumours : Sony Xperia Rumours 2016
> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Rumours > Sony Xperia Rumours 2016 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 717273 ... 183184185>

supercoolman Posts: > 500


On 2016-04-20 11:32:48, blackzeros wrote:
Xperia X Premium,Introducing the World’s first HDR Display Smartphone: ※5.5" HDR Premium Display(FHD 120Hz,1000nits WhiteMagic IPS-NEO,TRILUMINOS,HDR EOTF). ※Snapdragon 820 + 3GB RAM LPDDR4 + 64GB ROM. ※3720mAh Battery , QC3.0. ※USB Type-C. Other Spec:Same as X Performance.


64GB ROM? for real?

if X Premium is real, what would Z do? go Z Ultra or?
--
Posted: 2016-04-20 13:00:37
Edit : Quote

Xajel Posts: > 500


On 2016-04-20 13:00:37, supercoolman wrote:

64GB ROM? for real?

if X Premium is real, what would Z do? go Z Ultra or?


I think I mentioned it here before, both X and Xp has 64GB ROM option ( the dual SIM version ).. so it will be strange that the Premium doesn't at least follow the path or to go 64GB exclusively ( as a Premium )
--
Posted: 2016-04-20 13:51:06
Edit : Quote

herasymcuk Online Posts: 174


On 2016-04-20 11:32:48, blackzeros wrote:
Xperia X Premium,Introducing the World’s first HDR Display Smartphone: ※5.5" HDR Premium Display(FHD 120Hz,1000nits WhiteMagic IPS-NEO,TRILUMINOS,HDR EOTF). ※Snapdragon 820 + 3GB RAM LPDDR4 + 64GB ROM. ※3720mAh Battery , QC3.0. ※USB Type-C. Other Spec:Same as X Performance.

4K display....the source reported this, at least!
--
Posted: 2016-04-20 16:55:05
Edit : Quote

kurtdean Posts: > 500

Source said FHD but gsmarena.com said 4k so 4k panel is not true
--
Posted: 2016-04-20 18:51:31
Edit : Quote

herasymcuk Online Posts: 174


On 2016-04-20 18:51:31, kurtdean wrote:
Source said FHD but gsmarena.com said 4k so 4k panel is not true

Source (phone radar) didn't say FHD. It says "beyon UHD - HDR".....it speaks "full hd" about the upcoming Xperia "Performance" - not about the Premium.
--
Posted: 2016-04-20 19:11:37
Edit : Quote

hihihans Posts: > 500

WARNING!
Can we keep the reactions constructive.
Everyone is entitled to have their opinion but "I knew it would be bad" is no good for nobody.
--
Posted: 2016-04-20 19:39:57
Edit : Quote

ADIDA Posts: > 500

Ricciolo1 (18dec)

It's BIG,it's FLAT,it's SLIM and it's... ‪#‎4K‬ ! What's this?
--
Posted: 2016-04-20 20:19:31
Edit : Quote

penguino Posts: 221


On 2016-04-20 03:23:52, >500 wrote:
Too big? Big bezels? Old design? Little RAM? Poor display calibration? Mediocre camera? Stupid price? If you're referring to the so called X Premium, you realise it's just a RUMOR? It baffles me that you can say such things about a phone that does NOT EXIST. (yet at least)

However, If you are referring to the X Performance, I agree that the price is probably going to be high. But, Design/Bezels subjective and completely personal preference. 3GB RAM on a 5" FHD screen is adequate. Poor display calibration, and you know this how? Have you seen the display in person? (There's no reviews of the X Performance screen, let alone short hands on articles). The only camera samples we've seen are from really early NON retail devices. Don't be so quick to harshly judge a phone that isn't even production ready, there's every chance it will improve in time for its release, or it won't. We'll just have to wait won't we? O, and the X Performance is not the 2016 flagship.

I know it's a rumor. But when rumor says 5,5" you already know it's going to be a massive phablet. It's going to belong to Xperia X series - all three models we know have massive bezels. Poor display calibration - like in every Sony's flagship.

I am referring to X Performance as well. Design isn't exactly subjective, it's still basically the same OmniBalance and it's just too old. Bezels are not subjective. Below 70% screen to body ratio is the worst for Sony's flagship since Z2. That's HTC M9 level. 3GB of RAM may be adequate to work but it's not a flagship level. And Sony's going to charge flagship money for it. Camera samples come from pre-production devices indeed but it never changes much. It's difficult to get rid of such amount of noise.
Again - X Performance may not be a flagship but they'll charge flagship money for it. And a proper flagship is going to have the same camera.


On 2016-04-20 07:54:13, hboy857 wrote:
Two trolls (1.penguino and 2.Ebato) return again to make useless comments. Even though the reviewers are impressed with the Xperia X with their hands on time these two can't help but post negative comments here. After Nodar I think its time to banned these two. Always posting useless flaming comments just to get attention.

Ove reviewer seems to be impressed but it looks like he never looked at the pictures. Open them in full size and you'll see awful noise even in good conditions.
--
Posted: 2016-04-20 21:37:14
Edit : Quote

>500 Posts: > 500

@penguino

Well if it's going to be 5.5", obviously it's not going to be 'compact'. And I don't think 5.5 classifies as a 'massive phablet', 6" maybe.

Saying every Sony flagship display calibration has been poor is incorrect. And in any case, that doesn't automatically mean the 'premium' will have this so called poor calibration.

How is it not subjective?
Old or not, it's YOU who doesn't like the design, there are people who like it. Big bezels or not, YOU don't like them. There are people who don't care about bezels, like myself.
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2016-04-21 00:58 ]

--
Posted: 2016-04-21 01:58:01
Edit : Quote

MyP910 Posts: > 500

when it comes to design, it will always be subjective. I don't have problem with bezel. There is nothing wrong with sony display at least to me and I don't have problem with the camera quality either.
--
Posted: 2016-04-21 03:18:48
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 717273 ... 183184185>

New Topic   Topic Locked
Forum Index

Esato home