>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
I would give my vote to the S4 Zoom.
I guess I'll never understand photography
--
Posted: 2013-08-23 07:39:00
Edit :
Quote
I also think the S4 Zoom a great cameraphone, however their photographic results compared to the 808 Pureview are far below average !
--
Posted: 2013-08-23 07:50:07
Edit :
Quote
Amsterdam - Holland... Six Smartphone Cameras And Six Shots (In Different Resolutions) – Part 2 !!!
http://pureviewclub.com/2013/16518
P.S: Behold another victory of
808 Pureview !
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-08-23 17:15 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-23 18:14:17
Edit :
Quote
Here are some random pics with different ISO settings... just to show how the phone does in tricky/real life situations ..
80 iso at a concert venue
same thing at 800iso .. yes, there is plenty of noise, but I would call this acceptable for a phone.
500iso, no flash, 1/8 hand held (this isn't me btw)
160iso, flash, 1/30
200iso, flash, 1/30
--
Posted: 2013-08-24 00:29:47
Edit :
Quote
I think the Nokia 808 Pureview really did became "
Cameraphone Hors Concours" When it was released, and still is one of the most fantastic piece of engineering camera to date. I still believe the 808 Pureview was ahead of it's team, is virtually impossible to be beaten one day !
The 1020 Pureview, with all it's new bells and whistles obviously had to make compromises to allow for a better "smart phone" experience. Some may argue que the 808 Pureview archaic Symbian did satisfy this, but more than less will agree que Symbian is dead, and other mobile operating systems have SUPERSEDED it. Unfortunately for camera oriented users like us, we want to trend the best possible quality from our mobile handset and the expected 1020 Pureview to be an ideal upgrade choice, from the much aged Symbian 808 Pureview handset. This did not happen, and the 1020 Pureview not only did not have the amazing IQ of the 808 Pureview, but it is worst Became noise, Increased CA issues, reduced bitrate color seen in skin tone color gradients, and a far from perfect Which Zeiss Lens seems to have issues in the outer edges of the frame. All this sacrifice just to have a slimmer outer housing and optical stabilization.
One has to ask, if
Damian Dinning was in charge of the Nokia Camera division today, the 1020 Pureview would have the same-outcome ?
Answer: Absolutely not !
For these and other 808 Pureview is definitely My Latest Nokia !
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-08-24 07:10 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-24 08:01:28
Edit :
Quote
Here is a very UNofficial S4 vs 808 test I did at my desk....
Original images are up fist and keep in mind I didn't really tweak either phones settings other than turning off flash...
S4 chooses ISO100
808 image is ISO200
Next is a 100% crop from each image
S4
808
And for dramatics.. I magnafied by a factor of 3 (300% crop)
S4
808
--
Posted: 2013-08-24 17:31:23
Edit :
Quote
^ very nice.. thanks for sharing!
The smaller sensor doesn't stand a chance...
--
Posted: 2013-08-24 18:26:50
Edit :
Quote
@mlife:
Very interesting, thanks
@Sonysta:
When you copy 99% of someone else's post on another forum, you could at least have the decency, to add a link to the source, i.e. original post:
http://pureviewclub.com/2013/16518/comment-page-1#comment-21635
--
Posted: 2013-08-24 18:54:45
Edit :
Quote
So nice to see a group of them actually being used
http://www.allaboutsymbian.co[....]ian_and_the_Nokia_808_in_t.php
On 2013-08-24 08:01:28, Sonysta wrote:
I think the Nokia 808 Pureview really did became "Cameraphone Hors Concours" When it was released, and still is one of the most fantastic piece of engineering camera to date. I still believe the 808 Pureview was ahead of it's team, is virtually impossible to be beaten one day
Its an over-engineered product .. it happens every once in a while
--
Posted: 2013-08-24 20:29:24
Edit :
Quote
Fan club in the real world
--
Posted: 2013-08-24 21:34:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
