Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 745746747 ... 996997998>

Raiderski Posts: > 500


And if you expect new people to post about those damn drivers

nobody begs you for this. "damn drivers" - they are someone's work, so cool down a bit


FIX IT!!!

are we your slaves?


You expect us to say something about these drivers when in fact I can't download them in the first place?

as i wrote earlier nobody begs you for this

www.camdrivers.wz.cz/


_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001
http://www.tinyurl.com/2c3quo (gallery)
http://www.tinyurl.com/ysc2wm (driver + config tool)

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-11-08 10:12 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-08 10:28:38
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

can any1 give me some help, i'm trying to mod the k800i camdriver so when with flash it doesn't give noise in the dark spots, could some1 recommend a iso and shutterspeed thanks
--
Posted: 2007-11-08 11:59:22
Edit : Quote

Sombra Posts: 165

ATTENTION CID49 PHONE USERS

I discover one difference in two methods of install camdriver which can influence in the quality of shots taked after, in the moment i making more some tests for after post the experience with samples, wait some hours.

Forwarding, can say which have gain in sharpness and notable reduction on noise.

Sorry for my poor english.

_________________
K750i CID49 (R1BC002) - Strong's SuperFunction 5.6

[ This Message was edited by: Sombra on 2007-11-08 13:20 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-08 14:16:42
Edit : Quote

Sombra Posts: 165

Hello everyone, now my tiny experience with camdriver install modes:

Incidentally, I discover which the final result updating camdrivers using different methods can influence photos taked after, expect no to be mistaken. See below my discover:

Generally, I upload camdrivers for phone using FSX method in XS++, before in v1.2 and now in v3.0 Beta, since only in this versions support correctly my K750i CID49.

Occur which I ever as used R1CA021 firmware in my phone, but in one opportunity decide change for older R1BC002 and in this occasion I perceived gain in image quality which in the first moment attribute to firmware version, but now know the real motive.


SOMBRA's GUIDE FOR INSTALL CAMDRIVER AND OBTAIN MORE QUALITY

1 - Instead of upload camdriver to phone using only FSX method, first flash the FS file desired using XS++ v3.0 Beta (version used is insignificant, if funcional, but 3.0 or higher open a new window explorer for FSX, extending pricipal interface of program).

2 - After of FS flashed, procedure with FSX mode to upload camdriver normally and install in phone.

3 - The last step is procedure flash in main firmware file of same version which FS file (obvious) and finally, can turn phone ON.

After turn ON, the mobile phone go show screen of first general initialization (with loading bar similar to installation of an operating system).

I don’t know the reason for difference in photos, but my opinion is linked precisely with this “general initialization”, but is only a supposition.

Let’s go to more important, comparison between samples:

Observation: camdriver used for all photos is Strong's SuperFunction 5.6 in K750i CID49 (R1BC002).


Photos with camdriver upload using only FSX on XS++ software:





Observe eletric wire in right on the image, almost imperceptible.


Now, photos taked after Sombra's Guide:











Now, eletric wire is perceptible at long distance


This possibly is my last post with image comparisons on forum, now i choose definitive camdriver for use and this method consume much free time.

Users, please, test this using preferred camdriver and return to post your comments.

WARNING: Backup all important data existent in mobile phone!

Sorry for my poor english.

_________________
K750i CID49 (R1BC002) - Strong's SuperFunction 5.6 Camdriver

[ This Message was edited by: Sombra on 2007-11-13 20:51 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-09 04:52:38
Edit : Quote

leetiran Posts: 134

@Somba


I don’t know the reason for difference in photos, but my opinion is linked precisely with this “general initialization”, but is only a supposition.


If we choose the menu "Master reset-Reset all" after only updating camdriver0.dat, can we get the same result?

[ This Message was edited by: leetiran on 2007-11-09 08:47 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-09 06:28:13
Edit : Quote

Milu Posts: 99

@Somba.

Very interesting think and U have a beer for it, bou i think u.ve got two similar photos to make test truly.

Oh. and one more thing. What about patch to move drivers to other

_________________
camdrivers.lua.pl Everything about camdrivers.

[ This Message was edited by: Milu on 2007-11-09 08:50 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-09 09:35:57
Edit : Quote

gedas5 Posts: 380

@ Somba

i really doubt if anyone nowadays is still using the old Bruteforce method to install camdrivers or acoustics...everyone is using FAR or patches to do so...which means that after using those methods our phones do not initialiase after flashing..so maybe reset would give the same result? how do you guys reckon?
--
Posted: 2007-11-09 11:08:22
Edit : Quote

Sombra Posts: 165

@leetiran and gedas5:

I also reflect over this possibility (Master Reset), but not try because only remember in mid of atualization process and how not tested, prefer to omit in "guide". But...

I imagine which Master Reset not cause the same result on camera, because i think which this have link with the fact of changes in FS file after installation.

Any form, this to serve how more one test for the users.


@Milu:

Ok, really, comparison between two similars photos is more interesting and i put some samples later.

Over the patch "move drivers to other", this also need change FS file (read above for details), but can't reply this question.


Sorry for my poor english

_________________
K750i CID49 (R1BC002) - Strong's SuperFunction 5.6

[ This Message was edited by: Sombra on 2007-11-09 14:54 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-09 11:46:12
Edit : Quote

Sombra Posts: 165

Ok my friends, attending request, below three samples for comparison.

Shots taked at similar daytime for best comparison.

Shot with camdriver upload using only SFX on XS++ Software


Shot with camdriver upload using "Sombra's method"


=======================================

Shot with camdriver upload using only SFX on XS++ Software


Shot with camdriver upload using "Sombra's method"


=======================================

Shot with camdriver upload using only SFX on XS++ Software


Shot with camdriver upload using "Sombra's method"



Unfortunatelly, daytime is similar, but sunlight condition in both cases are different, but I affirm which clarity in older photos also are good and after darkened when shot taked.


Sorry for my poor english.

_________________
K750i CID49 (R1BC002) - Strong's SuperFunction 5.6 Camdriver

[ This Message was edited by: Sombra on 2007-11-09 14:45 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-09 15:37:59
Edit : Quote

Milu Posts: 99

Yes @Sombra Yoru're right. Photos are so different. But i think then we cant aplly patch to move drivers to other... so its good way for people whois always using one camdriver, but i think i can do that
--
Posted: 2007-11-09 16:36:26
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 745746747 ... 996997998>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home