Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
Bookmark topic
On 2007-12-04 13:54:40, Randolph wrote:
Thank you raiderski for your new driver...
I just added effects like sepia and more and it works fine also in config tool.
But one question: What compression do you think will help for better pictures? 85% or 90% or 95% ?? My CID49 K750i with CID 36 cam manages all - I mostly shoot landscapes and city scenes...
regards,
Randolph
95%, which gives clearer more natural pictures.
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 13:57:59
Edit :
Quote
Sombra Hi,
My phone is w810i R4DB005 CID49. I try camera driver with your upload method. But i can't upload. XS++ v3.0 program don't find files on my phone.Can you halp me.
Activating filesystem
15:27:21| Command: Error 0x02
15:27:21| Command: Error 0x02
15:27:22| Command: Error 0x02
15:27:22| Command: Error 0x02
15:27:22| Command: Error 0x02
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 14:32:16
Edit :
Quote
Randolph
i can write many words but you can check this yourself:
1. set compression to max (95%)
2. make some shots of landscape and city
3. download JPEGsnoop (http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/jpeg-snoop.html)
4. examine "Marker DQT" section in every shots
4.1. look for "Approx quality factor =" value
4.2 write values from all shots on the paper or in txt file
quality value is right here:
5. when you finish look at values... are they interesting/surprising?
share those values on forum and i will tell you how to interpret them
i hope that result of this test (with your help) will be the final conclusion of compression topic
if someone is interested too then please join to this test and give us your results and phone model!
number1
95%, which gives clearer more natural pictures.
yeah right especially on our small pitty 2MP/3MP sensors
so... proofes, proofes, proofes and one more time: proofes if you want to be accurate
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 15:09:39
Edit :
Quote
not sure if it's the same for the k750/w800i but heres the proof for k800i
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=152275&start=45
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 15:14:21
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-12-04 15:09:39, Raiderski wrote:
Randolph
i can write many words but you can check this yourself:
1. set compression to max (95%)
2. make some shots of landscape and city
3. download JPEGsnoop (http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/jpeg-snoop.html)
4. examine "Marker DQT" section in every shots
4.1. look for "Approx quality factor =" value
4.2 write values from all shots on the paper or in txt file
quality value is right here:
5. when you finish look at values... are they interesting/surprising?
share those values on forum and i will tell you how to interpret them
i hope that result of this test (with your help) will be the final conclusion of compression topic
if someone is interested too then please join to this test and give us your results and phone model!
i had some very interesting results on my k800i, using the standard driver which with compression at 90% i have got a couple 95% compressed pics,
in my k800i pic collection i've seen everything from 76%-96%, mainly 90%-96%
--
Posted: 2007-12-04 16:39:14
Edit :
Quote
Where is sarmad?
Is it true that sarmad has release sarmad 5.9?
bcos what I know, the latest sarmad driver is sarmad 5.8.
I know this from se-nse, but I can't found the driver
--
Posted: 2007-12-05 07:17:26
Edit :
Quote
using lpachuong A4A 10.0
suppose to be a moon
heart shape mushroom??
--
Posted: 2007-12-05 08:00:02
Edit :
Quote
Raider 6.6 original compression, normal quality
Approx quality factor = 86.14 (scaling=27.71 variance=1.15)
Approx quality factor = 86.29 (scaling=27.42 variance=0.23)
Approx quality factor = 85.07 (scaling=29.87 variance=1.10)
Approx quality factor = 85.33 (scaling=29.34 variance=0.20)
Raider 6.6 compression at 91%, normal quality
Approx quality factor = 87.03 (scaling=25.94 variance=1.28)
Approx quality factor = 86.92 (scaling=26.15 variance=0.38)
Approx quality factor = 90.96 (scaling=18.08 variance=1.14)
Approx quality factor = 90.96 (scaling=18.08 variance=0.23)
Approx quality factor = 90.96 (scaling=18.08 variance=1.14)
Approx quality factor = 90.96 (scaling=18.08 variance=0.23)
Approx quality factor = 90.96 (scaling=18.08 variance=1.14)
Approx quality factor = 90.96 (scaling=18.08 variance=0.23)
Raider 6.6.1 compression 95%, normal quality
Approx quality factor = 95.14 (scaling=9.72 variance=1.21)
Approx quality factor = 94.95 (scaling=10.11 variance=0.30)
But what mean realy "filtering" in the config tool? How does it affect picture quality? As noise filter might lose some details...??
[ This Message was edited by: Randolph on 2007-12-05 10:40 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-05 08:47:25
Edit :
Quote
hehehe...
i think raiderski own this thread..
--
Posted: 2007-12-05 10:26:28
Edit :
Quote
@whatsucka
With your pictures, if you had changed the shutter speed or exposure to 1.7, the pictures would have been clearer (not blurry). Hope this experience helps.
@everyone: I tried tommymar's mod driver and it is as good as lpachuong's driver. Has anyone tried it? I have one small problem with it but not sure it's bcz of my phone or it's bcz of the driver. Hope everyone share your point of view about this driver. Cheer.
--
Posted: 2007-12-05 23:51:48
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
