>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson K700 discussion
Bookmark topic
Mine too, however for the few couple of months a 6600 might be cheaper on PAYG or sim free than a K700..
from my experience, a 6600 has much more reliable bluetooth range, it will easily pickup and communicate with other devices upto and over 10m. My T610 and everyone elses who i tested ( i have lots of friends with T610's) often struggle to reach 10m, and sometimes much less than. ! :'(
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 14:12:56
Edit :
Quote
Yup, the 6600 is a good phone overall. So what do u think?
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 14:23:55
Edit :
Quote
For me it will come down to which is cheaper when the K700 is released..
I love the style of the K700, the interface, the fact it has a radio, and that cool panorama feature with the camera..
But the nokia has more memory.. more advanced OS.. possibly more reliable Bluetooth...
Price will determine which i go for as a T610 replacement until the S700 graces my sweaty palms.
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 14:29:15
Edit :
Quote
more reliable bluetooth? i don't think so. based on my experiences with nokia's bluetooth enable phones, it's totally crapped up.
i've got a burning qn here. is the k700 able to stream videos (.avi .mpg etc)? and how much would a s700 cost?
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 15:34:03
Edit :
Quote
he konijn,
according te reviews the k700 has 32mb free memory for the user to use. thats enough for at least a couple of minuts of video
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 15:50:57
Edit :
Quote
32mb of memory shared between storage and the phones OS / running memory.
Apparently only around 12-14mb of the memory is available to the user as storage, the rest is used up by the OS, firmware ROM and operating space.
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 16:18:24
Edit :
Quote
etaab,
although the review from eldar states that there is only 12-14 mb fot the user, there isn't good confirmation on the subject.
but the review on
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=358003 states that the phone has approx. 40 mb memory and the reviewer expects that the o/s takes up only 8 tot 10 mb allowing the user to use 30 to 32 mb.
ofcourse we know nothing for sure until the phone is offialy released
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 16:28:00
Edit :
Quote
on this foto you can see clearly that it say 40378KB or
+/- 40MB free memory
So maybe it's not true that you only would have 14MB or so that you can use
photo was found in this review
http://www.howardforums.com/s[....]?s=&postid=2902579#post2902579
See for your self and let me be naïve
*Still hoping on a lot of memory
Cheers
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 20:10:39
Edit :
Quote
Yea, thats what I hope for! If the memory is at least 30mb, I will buy it, but if it is less, it has not enough space for mp3 files, and it might as well have been without a mp3player at all. And for me mp3 support is very important, so the ammount of memory will actually be the determining factor for me.
--
Posted: 2004-05-11 23:19:26
Edit :
Quote
I really do hope it has that 40mb available to the user, and its not shared - it'll be great for the odd MP3, lots of pictures and some videos with sound.
I wouldnt use the K700 as an MP3 player anyway, i used my iPaq 1930 for that, and right now i use my xda2 with a 512mb sd card !
None of them would beat an iPod though.
--
Posted: 2004-05-12 00:12:08
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
