Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : W900i official.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> W900i official.
Bookmark topic
c'mon flash memory in phones is the futur - its not like it is impossible
when people pay 200 euros for a apple nano, they won't argue with a all in one package
€dit
its not like i'm completly pissed with the w900, its a good job by se
but we all know that the competion is not as far behind as we think
4GB flash will be standart pretty soon (for music phones) - and this time its not only nokia and samsung who se is fighting with, they also want to gain some shares of the other mp3 player creators and therefor 500 is not what gives them a large cake
[ This Message was edited by: jack00 on 2005-10-17 19:23 ]
--
Posted: 2005-10-17 20:16:43
Edit :
Quote
A nano doesn't do anything else but store & play music... so ok.. tack on another $200 to the W900 to get your 4GB storage. Same story.
--
Posted: 2005-10-17 20:23:18
Edit :
Quote
Totally underwhelmed.
I have an iPod for music thanks, I don't want a phone that carries a few hundred songs - I can't be doing wih this continual push towards walkman phones.
First there was the T68i, then the P800, now I own the s700 but nothing else catches they eye.
SE needs to pull its finger out before I upgrade my S700.
--
Posted: 2005-10-17 20:58:11
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-10-17 20:23:18, jplacson wrote:
A nano doesn't do anything else but store & play music... so ok.. tack on another $200 to the W900 to get your 4GB storage. Same story.
it wouldn't cost 200euros per memory unit for sony
--
Posted: 2005-10-17 21:00:29
Edit :
Quote
anybody heard anything about the calender? have they touched that area yet? SE seems to have left that area since they started manufacturing!
NEVER MIND, answer found.
also i WANT ONE, great upgrade to my s700!!!!
finally full screen video!!!!
[ This Message was edited by: peacemf on 2005-10-17 20:40 ]
--
Posted: 2005-10-17 21:36:00
Edit :
Quote
WOW really nice, have to see it tho, and just in time fir my contract upgrade in December
--
Posted: 2005-10-17 22:13:58
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-10-17 17:31:09, Arne Anka wrote:
Magazine Mobil has already tried it out.
http://mobil.mkf.se/ArticlePa[....]/20051017164610_MOB312.dbp.asp
To summarise the content of the short review above:
- Video conferencing works well although the sound was not the best.
- Possibility to take snapshots of the one you are video conferencing with...
Ummm... could be a problem here. NZ Law says you can't take photos of people without thier consent in certain circumstances. I'm sure other countries have similar laws.
_________________
The Official Rugby Topic[ This Message was edited by: carkitter on 2005-10-17 22:36 ]
--
Posted: 2005-10-17 23:27:41
Edit :
Quote
Same rule applies here as when you record a conversation. At the remote end you probably here a sound whenever somebody takes the snap (click). So you will probably not be able to do it silently.
--
Posted: 2005-10-18 00:08:33
Edit :
Quote
Although.. Video calling DOES ask you if you wish to accept the video call, thats probably the way around that car. if you don't want to have your image elsewhere, you don't accept the video call
--
Posted: 2005-10-18 00:13:21
Edit :
Quote
@Gigs
You're right, but how many kiwis do you think have thought through the full implications of video calls?
_________________
The Official Rugby Topic[ This Message was edited by: carkitter on 2005-10-17 23:26 ]
--
Posted: 2005-10-18 00:25:07
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
