General discussions : Esato forum : Esato article on Wikipedia.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Esato forum
> Esato article on Wikipedia.
Bookmark topic
thanks scotsboyuk.
--
Posted: 2006-01-21 05:57:23
Edit :
Quote
It would appear that there has been a spot of vandalism on the Wiki. Someone deleted the entries in the 'members of Note' section; they have been restored though.
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 18:58:38
Edit :
Quote
@scots - Any 'suspects'
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 19:13:33
Edit :
Quote
@jojo
There is just an IP address listed for whomever deleted the content.
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 20:34:58
Edit :
Quote
nic.com
Shame there are always people who choose destructive energy over constructive..... it might have been so much more gratifying to add your own choice for members of note instead...
(hey i still remember the code for most smilies!!

)
_________________
!! My V800 Theme Making Tutorial !!
Talk about gadgets, movies, computers and much much more[ This Message was edited by: Vlammetje on 2006-01-24 20:52 ]
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 21:51:33
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-01-24 19:13:33, JN wrote:
@scots - Any 'suspects'
I think i know who it may be but i won't name any names....yet!
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 21:57:35
Edit :
Quote
I see.... far better to leave hints and create an (perhaps unfounded) air around some unsuspecting sod??
Let's just leave it be imho.
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 22:01:50
Edit :
Quote
I hope that in the END, only one and only ONE member can alter the pages on WIKI (Esato's) ! A 'respected' one at that . . . Scots is one of my nominees . . .
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 22:02:14
Edit :
Quote
i do not think wiki works like that
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 22:04:22
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-01-24 22:02:14, JN wrote:
I hope that in the END, only one and only ONE member can alter the pages on WIKI (Esato's) ! A 'respected' one at that . . . Scots is one of my nominees . . .
Yes absolutely i agree we should leave it to scots to handle wiki.
--
Posted: 2006-01-24 22:09:32
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply