Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
Bookmark topic
aint it? Aksd was talkin past tense... therefore i concluded that he really had done what he was tryin to explain.. therefore that discovery was included on the very latest link he gaved for that driver...
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 10:41:37
Edit :
Quote
hmm, I thought aksd meant new developments, but don't mind if I'm wrong
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 10:48:32
Edit :
Quote
i have already try the version 6.0 but it seem compresson of the file still the same with the original version (5.4/R1CA)
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 10:51:04
Edit :
Quote
He never mentioned aanything about JPG compression on this early breakthrough
Quote:
On 2006-06-28 07:51:37, aksd wrote:
WE HAVE A BREAKTHROUGH!
I set ISO to 100....minimum noise...check it out....
New stuff- Sharpness at 16
Spot - Enabled
COntrast - 0
Focus Mode- Full Range(changed from Normal)
ISO - Fixed at 100
EDIT:
Nope the ISO thing did'nt work out lol
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 11:01:24
Edit :
Quote
still looking latest cam version with the best jpg compression and picture quality...
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 11:21:50
Edit :
Quote
still the most versatile is the oem config (with perhaps some fps and compression tweaking), but aksd's driver will soon make stock drivers obsolete.
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 11:25:09
Edit :
Quote
you bet... and it will be sooner than we think.
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 11:35:54
Edit :
Quote
Modding the Camera drivers is an interesting topic. I agree with MAx_Wedge that the OEM drivers are best. When mucking around with the compression settings all I saw was an increase in file size and not much difference in picture quality. I would think that SE have got the driver pretty much at its best setting. But keep modding and see where you go. However, I would suggest when creating your own version numbers that it is not only a little vain, it is also going to end up in confusion when/if SE's version numbers catch up. Before you know it everyone will create their own version and it will be very hard to tell what's what. It would be more professional to include a comment in the driver about the author and date (if possible) or to pick a version number scheme that is not similar to SE's. Just a thought.
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 11:41:07
Edit :
Quote
so the question is....
how do you put comments inside an Assembly Language?
..::EDIT::..
OK! its the sharp (#) for putting comments
_________________
Just click the damn link!!!
fireEGG™
[[ K750i | R1CA021 | EU_2 | 1GBms-PD ]]
[ This Message was edited by: rockygali on 2006-06-28 10:51 ]
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 11:42:46
Edit :
Quote
rockygali,
I was looking at your two photos above. Are you quite sure about the +2 and +1 alternatives? You probably know the higher + value should give lighter, intentional overexposure (if we follow common standard in photography), not the other way round. So, is this a typo by you, or did the display indeed show +2.0 and still exposure less than with +1.0? Seems like something is wrong, upside down, so to say...
Or are you talking about other +1/+2 than those selected by joystick as exposure compensation?
And esato is stripping the exif data away...
EDIT: -2.0 and -1.0 would make sense...
[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-06-28 10:46 ]
--
Posted: 2006-06-28 11:43:56
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
