>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K850i vs N95 pic quality
Bookmark topic
@Mode
antagonising Moi? never.
Marc
_________________
Nokia E61, 2gb Sandisk, Fring, Tom Tom 6
Honoured to have won BEST DEBATER
[ This Message was edited by: Dogmann on 2007-10-29 17:44 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 18:43:53
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-29 13:40:26, BobaFett wrote:
n95 screen was a disappointment for me, it would have dserved e60, e70 or at least n80 display... so i have to admit, k850 is better ( more clear )
No, there's a reason why they dont go for those screens anymore. Firstly because of the battery consumption, secondly because the screen res. is so "not normal" many applications including themes looked awful.
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 18:48:06
Edit :
Quote
Sorry to have 'irritated' you. I give you a tip - next time IGNORE my post
Well, for what it's worth, thanks for the solution. Maybe I should take a mental note and do just that
@Dogmann
Yes, I'm talking about you my friend
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 02:19:44
Edit :
Quote
No offence to Plankgatan - but I can't see why everyone raves about the quality of his photo's. Sure they may be nice shots and all but they have been shrunk down so much that any noise in the photo's is hidden. This is not mastery - it is deception and I'm not buying it. I can shrink down pictures from any crappy low end 1mp camera and they too will look great. There's just no point to 5mp if you're going to shrink photo's down to below VGA size. I should be able to view a 5mp image at full res. At the very least I should be able to view a 5mp image on a full screen without any obvious imperfections. In my case my full screen is 1280x1020 - Which, if I’m not mistaken will be like shrinking the photo down to 1.3mp. So those who like to shrink photo's shouldn't have an issue we people who like to view images full screen.
The photo comparison on
http://smape.com/en/reviews/n[....]Ericsson_K850ivsNokia_N95.html clearly show's (to me) that the imaging quality of the K850 is a big disappointment. If you like you can download and shrink the photos from the smape review and they'll actually look O.K. - try it yourself. But, if you shrink the same N95 shots the N95 shots actually look better than the shrunk k850 photos. When it comes to imaging the N95 is clearly better - I've tested an N95 against my K800 and the N95 produced much better and clearer shots. K850 is not yet out in Australia so I can't test one. Now I'm an SE owner and prefer SE phones but at least I can be objective and admit when another product produces a better result. Unlike some here who just seem to take some childish resentment to anyone who would bag out an SE phone - especially if they own it.
Lastly, I challenge Plankgatan to post full res and un-altered versions of the shrunken shots he has previously posted. I do not understand or accept his reluctance to so. If his photo's are that great I want to see them at full res and unaltered so that I/we can make my/our own judgement and actually get some real proof that the K850 does take good shots. Hopefully I may even be able to look at them in awe. Despite previous claims it's not hard to post full size 5mp images to esato. You can post up to 4 full res pictures per day right here:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos.
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 04:02:03
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-30 04:02:03, mongoose3800 wrote:
Lastly, I challenge Plankgatan to post full res and un-altered versions of the shrunken shots he has previously posted. I do not understand or accept his reluctance to so.
Second that.
(but I doubt plankgatan will ever have the guts to do that.)
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 04:16:13
Edit :
Quote
mongoose3800:
A very well put post! Completely agree with you.
Now let's see if Plankgatan takes up your open challenge, which he's been ducking for a while now!
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 04:19:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-30 04:16:13, mib1800 wrote:
On 2007-10-30 04:02:03, mongoose3800 wrote:
Lastly, I challenge Plankgatan to post full res and un-altered versions of the shrunken shots he has previously posted. I do not understand or accept his reluctance to so.
Second that.
(but I doubt plankgatan will ever have the guts to do that.)
or probably because he doesnt know how to upload full pics
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 07:02:04
Edit :
Quote
@mongoose3800 Nice one bud - Thumbs UP
Nice too see, one can stil be as impartial as you are in this forum. And yes I know I am not impartial -
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 07:09:15
Edit :
Quote
why must everything turn into arguements? I think every one knows by now k850 photos arent too crash hot. Lets see if firmware updates can improve them, although they should have been a little better at release imo. We dont need people to keep saying k850 photos are crap, once is enough!
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 07:13:52
Edit :
Quote
No argument intended here. This is just a debate over which 5mp camera phone provides better pics - Both of them are rather mediocre anyway. The point here is someone is claiming exceptional performance but not providing any real tangible evidence. I want to see some evidence. So, lets keep it as a friendly and healthy debate and keep emotions out of it. When the full resolution pics are provided be honest and objective.
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 10:02:55
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
