>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> short comparision c902 & c905
Bookmark topic
no big defference between the two ???
--
Posted: 2008-11-15 09:41:08
Edit :
Quote
Love the way these forums turn into slanging matches.
--
Posted: 2008-11-15 17:54:44
Edit :
Quote
http://blog.se-nse.net/2008/1[....]d80-night-shoot-out/#more-3708
c902 is awful
--
Posted: 2008-11-20 20:01:58
Edit :
Quote
I think the c902 pics in bright conditions looks just as good or even better in many situations compared to the c905:s. In my eyes and compared to all samples i have seen so far in this forum the c905 having big problems with taking sharp pictures.
The c902 are amazing in good light and macro as i have stated plenty of times before but ofcourse it sucks when it comes to flash-pics and compared with the c905 strong flash.
But flash pics with c905 looks no good either (yet) in my opinion and people get strange skin-tones and so on. I think thereīs much improvement needed before i will run and buy a c905. My N82 took much better flash-pics at our latest party compared to a friends c905.
I sold my N82 yesterday and after spending some time looking at all crisp and sharp pictures from my earlier c902:s i decided to go for one yet again. The c905 have not amazed me yet but i think there will be improvements later on with firmware upgrades but when? The c902 have reached itīs potential i think but it gets you quite far ( in good light
)
Ofcourse i went for the titanium edition
--
Posted: 2008-11-20 22:19:58
Edit :
Quote
C902 had no chances in this comparision but I think this phone can do a lot better results in low-light than we know. even old K800 can give great results in 2s exposure time. imagine this in C902 - enabled LED during all 2s exposure and more sensitive sensor (K800 need ISO640 while C902 only ISO250 to get the same result). sounds good for me
... any C902 user who want to experiment?
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-11-20 22:08 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-20 22:57:25
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-11-20 22:19:58, Pitzon wrote:
I think the c902 pics in bright conditions looks just as good or even better in many situations compared to the c905:s. In my eyes and compared to all samples i have seen so far in this forum the c905 having big problems with taking sharp pictures.
The c902 are amazing in good light and macro as i have stated plenty of times before but ofcourse it sucks when it comes to flash-pics and compared with the c905 strong flash.
But flash pics with c905 looks no good either (yet) in my opinion and people get strange skin-tones and so on. I think thereīs much improvement needed before i will run and buy a c905. My N82 took much better flash-pics at our latest party compared to a friends c905.
I sold my N82 yesterday and after spending some time looking at all crisp and sharp pictures from my earlier c902:s i decided to go for one yet again. The c905 have not amazed me yet but i think there will be improvements later on with firmware upgrades but when? The c902 have reached itīs potential i think but it gets you quite far ( in good light
)
Ofcourse i went for the titanium edition
I agree.
I feel c902 take better pictures in all envoirements except for flash.another thing is that c902 camera is more speedy, thats very good.
tnx Nicke
_________________
Veni, Vidi, Vici
[ This Message was edited by: nicke.picke on 2008-11-23 12:14 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-21 08:52:17
Edit :
Quote
hello, what is the photo flash operating range of c902? thanks
--
Posted: 2009-05-28 17:07:04
Edit :
Quote
woo im gonna sell my c905 and buy the c902 always is the best.
any camera can win to the c902?? thanks..
--
Posted: 2009-05-28 19:38:39
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
