Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Which Sony Ericsson phone should be on the Hall of Shame
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Which Sony Ericsson phone should be on the Hall of Shame
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2009-03-05 01:01:45, Geframa wrote:
I see a lot of anti-SE people around here..........
Oh please... Don't start that crap. It's people giving their thoughts on devices which were bad for them....there have been quite a few crap se handsets. It happens..
--
Posted: 2009-04-01 21:07:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-01 20:21:41, abbafan1972 wrote:
On 2009-03-01 19:14:53, GUCCI.011 wrote:
W800? Are you serious? Thats the very phone that got me and im sure many other users into SE, that is a phone that deserves to be in the hall of fame, but anyway each to their own.
Yeah the user interface was good, but I didn't like the cheap plasticy feel of the case, nor the colour.
W900i is another worthy candidate, great big house brick.
You do not talk shit about one of the only good SE phones ever made.
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 08:01:15
Edit :
Quote
K700. I dont care how popular it was. One of the worst keypads i've ever used, worthless joystick, poor battery life.
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 08:58:18
Edit :
Quote
K700i was one of the better phones, it was veeery popular at its time.
P990i would go in my hall of shame, simply because it could have been so much better with more RAM and a faster processor.
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 09:28:06
Edit :
Quote
G502 for me - I went through 3 with wonky screens before giving up on the bugger! It was only like a mm or 2 out, but my eyes really picked up on it!
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 09:47:45
Edit :
Quote
I only owned two
phones: the amazing K750i, and the utter failure that fully deserves entering the hall of shame, namely the
K850i
So that's my vote.
[ This Message was edited by: catalinux on 2009-04-02 09:18 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 10:17:03
Edit :
Quote
i dont think popular has anything to do with it. P990 and K850 were immensely popular and a lot of people have them
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 11:09:16
Edit :
Quote
Good for its time though. The only thing missing from it was expandable memory. I wasn't a great fan of it purely for its funny buttons but it was a good move on their behalf.
W900i shouldn't be in the hall of shame really. I thought that particular phone was great - despite its size. It sold well but was pulled prematurely for no apparent reason.
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2009-04-02 10:22 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 11:20:46
Edit :
Quote
t68i, t610, P800, P900
w900 was a great phone despite the size.
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 14:40:17
Edit :
Quote
crossmatched Posts: > 500
On 2009-04-02 11:20:46, goldenface wrote:
Good for its time though. The only thing missing from it was expandable memory. I wasn't a great fan of it purely for its funny buttons but it was a good move on their behalf.
W900i shouldn't be in the hall of shame really. I thought that particular phone was great - despite its size. It sold well but was pulled prematurely for no apparent reason.
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2009-04-02 10:22 ]
imo mate, w900 was pulled out from the market prematurely because its way ahead of its time. the competitors of w900 back then were n70, n90, n91, d900. none of them were good in all three of these: photo, music and video.
w900 boasted of 30 fps video rec and playback that none of its competitors can do. w900 has the k750-esque cam, had the w800 improved walkman UI and the great video graphics' powered video rec.
i onced used w900 in recording our christmas get away when we shoot the rapids in a raging river. and OMG the video is fluid! as fluid as the water flow
anyways, my vote for the hall of shame: K850.
it put the Cybershot branding into shame.
what good reputation k750 and k800 gained was destroyed by k850.
it was the first time that the camera throne was vacated by SE and was occupied by nokia.
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2009-04-02 14:50 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-02 15:48:42
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
