>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Sony Ericsson X10 Official Thread
Bookmark topic
On 2009-11-03 12:14:38, sealover94 wrote:
On 2009-11-03 12:06:55, XPHCTOC wrote:
Since SEXX (10 in latin) has a capacitive screen, it's highly possible that multitouch will come with an update to 2.1. (the new version of android coming at the end of this year). Android has a very good upgrade politic: the devices under this Os upgrade easily to the latest version. More than 60% of the devices are now running donut, 30% are running cupcake.
Android + SE = HOT thing
You say that the hardware suppots multitouch ?
Take a look at this photo to see what i mean when i say bad screen
**PHOTO**
I still don't understand why you're indicating the screen is bad... This photo is out of focus (look at the xperia logo).
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:20:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-03 12:18:43, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
@sealover: How old are you? You need to grow up. Asking stupid questions like "where are the speakers?" and having a cry. What does it matter where the speakers are? Of course it has speakers.
Time and time again people have told you that amounts of colours don't matter much but you still complain. Wait until the screen is confirmed before you comment. Showing us pictures of the screen doesn't prove anything at all, Sony Ericsson makes good screens and I can't think of a single high-end Sony Ericsson screen that has been bad in the last few years. I just went from a C902 (262k) to an Aino (16mill) and there is no noticeable difference. I guarantee you the screen on the X10 will be superb. Do you see any major websites complaining about the screen in their hands-on with the phone?
OLED was never ever a rumour. Nobody credible said that was coming, so I don't now where you got that from. Please quit being a whiner or take your complaints elsewhere. Every major new SE phone thread has your whining in it, and quite frankly I think we're all sick of it.
Not young enought to respond to your personal "refferings" ....
Okay.. blame the engadget photographer... as you wish...i'm not tryin to convince any of you...
This called PERSONAL opinion..
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:27:08
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
@sealover:
Sony Ericsson's 262k screens are noted as being some of the best on the market. The above image is the official specs taken from Engadget where it lists a 262k scratch resistant display. Now get over it.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:27:10
Edit :
Quote
c905's screen is much MUCH different than w995 screen... both having same resolution and colors... So what??
Multitouch?16M AMOLED? RING ANY BELLS TO YOU ??
Is this video out of focus too ??????????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ytEOOTGtIo
Or they slow down the speed
The phone software is SOOO slow.... prepare for delays..
[ This Message was edited by: sealover94 on 2009-11-03 11:33 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:28:53
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
On 2009-11-03 12:28:53, sealover94 wrote:
c905's screen is much MUCH different than w995 screen... both having same resolution and colors... So what??
Multitouch?16M AMOLED? RING ANY BELLS TO YOU ??
Well no. AMOLED was never a rumour from a trusted source.
And neither the C905's or W995's screen are at all bad from experience. Both were really really good.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:34:48
Edit :
Quote
XPERIA X10 White paper. Enjoy
http://developer.sonyericsson.com/getDocument.do?docId=102192
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:35:49
Edit :
Quote
Sick of ur posted sealover94
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:35:57
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-03 12:18:43, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
Showing us pictures of the screen doesn't prove anything at all, Sony Ericsson makes good screens and I can't think of a single high-end Sony Ericsson screen that has been bad in the last few years. I just went from a C902 (262k) to an Aino (16mill) and there is no noticeable difference. I guarantee you the screen on the X10 will be superb. Do you see any major websites complaining about the screen in their hands-on with the phone?
I''l add something to your post.
The first thing - if you read about human eye, its sensitivity and so on you can find out that 16.7mil of colors is marketing. This was proven and it's obvious.
The other thing is far more important. If someone doesn't know LCD works this way:
- there is source of light under the crystals and there are color filters over crystals. For each pixel there are 3 crystals (with red, green, blue filters over them). To create 262k of colors you have to give certain amount of power to each pixel. To create 16.7mil of colors you have to give MORE power to each pixel than for 262k. This math is simple. More power equals more battery drain.
So - If there is no difference for human eye when using 262k or 16.7mil and 16.7mil drains more battery which one do you choose?
[ This Message was edited by: tomasz.luch on 2009-11-03 11:38 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:36:59
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
On 2009-11-03 12:35:57, HxH wrote:
Sick of ur posted sealover94
I've decided to ignore him. He is just a troll, and an extremely ignorant, misinformed one at that.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:37:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-03 12:34:48, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
On 2009-11-03 12:28:53, sealover94 wrote:
c905's screen is much MUCH different than w995 screen... both having same resolution and colors... So what??
Multitouch?16M AMOLED? RING ANY BELLS TO YOU ??
Well no. AMOLED was never a rumour from a trusted source.
And neither the C905's or W995's screen are at all bad from experience. Both were really really good.
of course is not bad. C905's screen is the BEST !
But why this personal attack??? i just post photos and videos proving what i'm saying why you attack me....
[ This Message was edited by: sealover94 on 2009-11-03 11:42 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:37:06
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
