Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
Bookmark topic
Kriomag, does your 21.93 Beta work well with cid49 w800 r1bc002? Coz all the modded camdrivers i´ve used work terribly with this firmware (remember i swapped cam modules to cid36 also).
Cheers
[ This Message was edited by: fernyperez on 2008-01-10 18:38 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 19:37:23
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-10 19:37:23, fernyperez wrote:
Kriomag, does your 21.93 Beta work well with cid49 w800 r1bc002? Coz all the modded camdrivers i´ve used work terribly with this firmware (remember i swapped cam modules to cid36 also).
Cheers
My brother has cid49 phone/cammodule and my driver works fine (fine with cid49? lol

) - best results i have with my cid49 phone with cid36 cammodule - less noise!!! and working zoom and saturation change.
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 20:00:42
Edit :
Quote
I see many of you change the cam modules... What is this cam module and where to get it and how to change?
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 20:06:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-10 20:06:13, Tomix wrote:
I see many of you change the cam modules... What is this cam module and where to get it and how to change?
the only way to get cid36 camera module is old k750i (broken/crashed but with untouched camera module)
I changed my camera module in service (private phone store/service ? my english sucks

), they had broken k750i but with almost as new cid36 camera module

it costed me only ~17$ (50zł)
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 20:33:51
Edit :
Quote
Now understand and all i have to say is f**k! I have to live with cid49...

Btw. My english isn't better

[ This Message was edited by: Tomix on 2008-01-10 21:18 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 22:14:52
Edit :
Quote
oh, Tomix you have CID49 module? then i understand why you have overexposure during EM/ENM shots. yes, this is often in CID49
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 22:54:48
Edit :
Quote
Common boys:) I live with cid49 and it's easy living... I haven't seen really big-enough reason to buy new module and open phone. I can make good photos too:)) Many people think, that with new module will come miracle (although don't know why) and then, they are a bit disillusioned. So, then, for miracle is better new phone

Ach, I wish, k750 could have cam module from sony, which have imobile 902 (what a irony:))

((
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 22:59:23
Edit :
Quote
You know something, Mr.Kája, you´re half right. Changing cam modules doesn´t give you the exact quality that CID36 phones have but it does correct it quite a lot. I bought mine from eBay Germany, this shop that sells new cid36 cam modules (or probably used and taken out from cid36 phones). It only cost me 8 euros + postage, about 12 eur in total. However, you´re right in that there´s no really big reason in changing nor is there a huge difference in quality. What i notice is that pics now are sharp at night and have no noise, but are still grainy with low light, nevertheless. Also, day pics are sharper than before, there´s no noise when photographing shade and you also get the full 4x zoom. Where i´m going crazy right now is trying different camdrivers because i just can´t seem to get the quality that cid36s have. For someone who likes photography, best option is waiting and getting a phone with optical zoom so u always have phone and camera on u (better wait for prices to go down first). However, for people who just want to quick snap a particular moment when u don´t have a camera on u, the K750 is just fine.
Cheers
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 23:33:11
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-10 15:17:18, 679 wrote:
Raiderski
Is it all right with EXIF ISO information in 6.7u?
Pay attention at noise level. I guess it should be more noise on 1-st snap, but it is vice versa. I check it several times.
...
who uses high ISO ? you must be a masochist
if you take picture with high iso the detail level are same as low as you would have taken this picture with 640x480 resolution and then resized it to 1632x1224
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 23:38:04
Edit :
Quote
ISO800 was mistake only, very easy to reproduce in EXIF

for sure this value in real was lower than 320 (something similar is on 2nd pic). as i wrote before this faulty EXIF description is possible only when EM ratio is changed in code
BTW: EM code changes done by
leetiran with small modification can be quite good solution for
679. final result is ISO160 pic but with half exposure time of original EM code
_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001 (driver 6.7.1u), awaiting for K800
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-01-10 22:57 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-10 23:49:44
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply