>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition
Bookmark topic
Now that's interesting. I wonder if one has a benefit over the other due to this difference.
Damnit, I want some new products! ZR isn't of any interest to me. Loved that slider that was leaked, but it's probably still a couple of weeks until we see anything official. E3 is nearly a month away too. Even more time until the new phones get announced.
*sigh*
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 10:25:00
Edit :
Quote
Any new news/rumours on Honami? Even
XR3, or possibly XR4 info ?
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 10:29:58
Edit :
Quote
OT...
but Sharp Loss Widens to $5.36 Billion
TOKYO—After posting an annual net loss of ¥545 billion ($5.4 billion), the biggest in its 100-year history, Sharp Corp. said it plans to replace both its president and chairman after just one year in an unusually public rebuke of former management that underscores the depth of the struggling electronics maker's problems.
http://online.wsj.com/article[....]3716304578482223333906186.html
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 10:41:18
Edit :
Quote
Sony seems set to make a big push in Africa, including mobile devices
http://allafrica.com/stories/201305140359.html
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 10:49:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-05-14 10:21:16, randomuser wrote:
Btw
Sony 55 inch 4K set uses Sharp IGZO panel and the 65 inch uses AUO panel.
You mean it's not triluminos?
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 12:52:39
Edit :
Quote
^
Of course it features Triluminos. Trilluminos is not a panel type, just a filter between panel and backlight
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 12:59:16
Edit :
Quote
I thought it doesn't use filters and produces the backlight using some sub atomic strings and every pixel consists of three light emitting units but instead of normal diodes used in CLED it uses QD's. So if it uses filters how is it more energy efficient?
[ This Message was edited by: MartenR on 2013-05-14 12:11 ]
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 13:09:53
Edit :
Quote
Who said it's more energy efficient
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 13:21:12
Edit :
Quote
So according to:
http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/c[....]ithout-oleds-by-ken-werner.php
Triluminos if used in smartphones is still far behind Samsung's AMOLED displays because of slower response time and less deep black and color gamut and viewing angles doesn't queit catch up with AMOLED. The only advantage Triluminos seems to have is color accuracy.
Few questions.
Will Sony implement both IGZO and Trilominus in the same panel or even with Whitemagic in their mobile panels?
Will Trilominus have brighter whites than AMOLEDs?
Edit: Reading that article I guess it's also more energy efficient because instead of just filtering the other unwanted waves in conventional LCDs it changes the blue light wave length. Do you think I'm right?
[ This Message was edited by: MartenR on 2013-05-14 12:51 ]
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 13:41:25
Edit :
Quote
Triluminos can be implemented with any panel, IGZO or Whitemagic or any other tech
And no, Triluminos doesn't affect white levels
--
Posted: 2013-05-14 13:52:54
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
