Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Symbian phones : Post pictures taken with Satio (idou)
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Symbian phones > Post pictures taken with Satio (idou) Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 838485 ... 101102103>

riksilvers Posts: 139

Put them here !!
--
Posted: 2010-09-07 16:54:07
Edit : Quote

Acelew Posts: 62

yeah,pls end it..and etaab,u r rite..
--
Posted: 2010-09-07 17:37:45
Edit : Quote

Acelew Posts: 62


Original
--
Posted: 2010-09-07 17:45:47
Edit : Quote

Acelew Posts: 62


--
Posted: 2010-09-07 17:55:03
Edit : Quote

norbi_nw Posts: > 500



Edit: Max i have posted the samples again on the other thread (Does anyone else hate the Satio). Samsung is 1st crop SE is 2nd.
[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2010-09-07 17:35 ]

--
Posted: 2010-09-07 18:30:58
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

@norbi_nw, I see what you mean now, but I'm pretty sure my satio is nothing like this. I would have noticed something that bad. When I get a chance I'll post some examples.


--
Posted: 2010-09-08 05:09:28
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

Infrared!

OutlookinInfrared

Visible light comparison:
Comparisonshotfor

TrainStationinInfrared

TraininInfrared

StreetinInfrared
--
Posted: 2010-09-08 08:42:56
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

the significance infrared images is that the image is composed of infrared light only, no visible light. Because different surfaces reflect infrared light differently to visible light, some things that are dark in visible light will appear bright in infrared light. Yet other things will appear aboutthe same. So infrared images, while initially look like "negative" images, are actually not negatives.

Dark things such as road surfaces appear darker (not brighter), and dark green foliage appears white.

Notice in the images above the bright white foliage - in visible light this foliage is actually dark green. Also notice the sky, which is dark compared to the bright blue of the sky in visible light.

The images are high iso, hence the graininess, because there is an Ir cut filter (blocks most Ir light) over the cmos sensor - so the camera has to increase the gain to capture the small amount of available Ir light.

With a tripod and shutterspeed control it is possible to take much better quality Ir photos.

note, these images are 'near infrared', not thermal infrared - they are not detecting heat sources; they are detecting reflected near infrared light.
[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2010-09-08 13:12 ]

--
Posted: 2010-09-08 08:58:25
Edit : Quote

norbi_nw Posts: > 500

And how did you took them?
--
Posted: 2010-09-08 16:24:51
Edit : Quote

davidsic Posts: > 500






--
Posted: 2010-09-08 17:58:45
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 838485 ... 101102103>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home