>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> Post pictures taken with Satio (idou)
Bookmark topic
--
Posted: 2010-09-08 19:58:22
Edit :
Quote
On 2010-09-08 16:24:51, norbi_nw wrote:
And how did you took them?
digicams have sensors that can detect Ir light. But the Ir light sensitivity is washed out due to the visible light so if you block off the visible light with some material that is opaque to visible light but transparent to Ir light (an Ir-pass filter), then the camera will up the gain (iso) to itulise the small amount of Ir light that gets past the camera's Ir-cut filter (A filter placed over the sensor to block out Ir light).
I used the antenna cover off a T610 (I cried when I cut it up to fit over the satio lens!). The T610 antenna cover doubles as an antenna cover and also a window for the Ir sensor.
You can also use the unexposed (but developed) end of a strip of film negative. About two layers will do. It will block visible light but let Ir light straight through.
--
Posted: 2010-09-09 01:17:42
Edit :
Quote
Personally i dont like those IR style pictures, i find them a bit pointless.
Im not very artistic !
Some more from me - i love disposable bbq's !
--
Posted: 2010-09-09 20:35:36
Edit :
Quote
@etaab I tend to agree with you, but depending on the scenery the results can be spectacular. The one's I've posted above are just an example - some shots I took on the way to a job site.
Some of the examples here show what can be done with a camera with tripod and control over shutterspeed:
http://dimagemaker.com/2006/12/07/some-more-infrared-photography/
http://www.moonriverphotograp[....]hy/1340265_zT6FF#7282247_zZncU
But the main thing that intrigues me about Ir photography is not the aesethetic aspect, but the fact we are looking at an image that the human eye couldn't normally view. There is something "other worldly" about the images.
--
Posted: 2010-09-10 01:39:26
Edit :
Quote
HDR is the way forward.....just need an app that lets you take the photos to do it !!!
--
Posted: 2010-09-10 01:43:51
Edit :
Quote
Yeah i think HDR is better when done professionally. IR photos would be nice when taking landscapes to hang on your wall in a modern day apartment. I prefer those IR photos which are black and white rather than the purple when using the T610 antenna cover.
--
Posted: 2010-09-10 18:51:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2010-09-10 18:51:19, etaab wrote:
Yeah i think HDR is better when done professionally. IR photos would be nice when taking landscapes to hang on your wall in a modern day apartment. I prefer those IR photos which are black and white rather than the purple when using the T610 antenna cover.
oh absolutely. that's why i wound the saturation back on some of those examples. Still i'm not touting them as great examples - just something i wipped up as an example of the medium. I'll post some more eventually and put more effort in.
Btw, good choice of beer in those mini bbq pics
--
Posted: 2010-09-11 02:46:02
Edit :
Quote
I'm not angry really believe me but annoying cuz u post it wrong place, just wanna end matter and keep it back to track so
If u said software supported is sucks big time (mine last month almost put it to sell it also unacceptable for me), I will agree with u that's all but camera ain't that suck as software os (but I still use it as capture some lecturer's board so I would not sell it cuz no replacement from
)
no more words from me about this topic! I'm finish!
--
Posted: 2010-09-11 18:50:06
Edit :
Quote
Uploaded with
ImageShack.us
--
Posted: 2010-09-12 02:49:00
Edit :
Quote
nice car..
--
Posted: 2010-09-12 17:34:36
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
