Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Android : Sony Xperia T & TX thread
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Android > Sony Xperia T & TX thread Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 858687 ... 197198199>

HxH Posts: > 500

To me

T - Sturdy

TX - Sleek

why don't stay with S and wait for Yuga to come?
I have a plan to buy TX but when it bargain and keep as collector edition.
--
Posted: 2012-11-13 06:42:05
Edit : Quote

Tsepz_GP Posts: > 500


On 2012-11-13 05:08:28, northmonkey wrote:

On 2012-11-12 23:26:26, Tsepz_GP wrote:
I cant speak of the T as i havent used it. As i own an S3 i can tell you its positives:

-UI is ridiculously fast and smooth consitantly, if you've used an S2 then S3 is even faster
-Battery life is incredible
-Hardly any heating up unless you play HD games heavily
-The best GPU of the two
-Support for HD DivX, Xvid, Avi etc... out-the-box
-Incredible sound quality thanks to the Wolfson Micro DAC, which can be tuned with Voodoo sound, yep, you can tune the audio chip!
-A ton of great gesture/motion features like Direct Call, and Smart Alert
-Huge mod community
-Feels great in hand despite its size
-Better video recording (check GSMArena for samples)
-S3 will get the Multiview multitasking update that the Note2 got, bringing PC like multitasking to the S3
-Higher mem variants e.g. 32GB and 64GB to, so if memory is a major thing you can have upto 128GB mem in your S3 if you get a 64GB one and add a 64GB mem card.
-It already has the Jelly Bean update and has another update to 4.1.2 next month coming while T will be ICS for a while.
-Solid phone overall, the most mass consumer friendly Android until the S4 arrives middle of next year.


Other things you will have to try both at some point for yourself side-by-side.
[ This Message was edited by: Tsepz_GP on 2012-11-12 22:30 ]



Thanks for that, you didn't mention the camera quality though do you think its better than the T?


Ive never bothered to compare the Cameras to be honest, not that much into photography, so i cant say anything about it. I think Gsmarena will have great samples for you to compare though.

HxH

If im not mistaken, the GS3 managed 720P@103FPS in the Egypt GLBenchmark, thats quite a notable difference between the Adreno and Mali GPUs.
--
Posted: 2012-11-13 08:41:15
Edit : Quote

HxH Posts: > 500

Who care and why care how much these phone can perform?

Did today mobile game support already?
Did battery life will survive a day with these kind of game play? (High-FPS)

I looking for casual games in my free time at bus stop or coffee shop
with decent graphic performance (720p@60fps), that's enough for (my today) phone.

BTW, I'm not benchmark bragging right, that isn't necessary part of my phone.
[ This Message was edited by: HxH on 2012-11-13 10:19 ]

--
Posted: 2012-11-13 11:19:35
Edit : Quote

Tsepz_GP Posts: > 500

The GPU plays a major roll in the entire Android UI since Android4.0, not just games, so its always nice to know how much load the GPU can take, the fact that the Mali GPU in the S3 can handle upto around 100FPS @ a res of 720P could explain why Samsungs UI is much smoother and consistantly faster than Sony's UI, and the reason why Samsung can add things like Multi-view multitasking and pop-up play without the phone breaking a single sweat, whilest all at the same time running at a lower CPU clock speed and producing better battery life.
--
Posted: 2012-11-13 11:43:37
Edit : Quote

Ricky D Posts: > 500

@randomuser I'm not sure many people in the forum here have tried both, I haven't, but I'm going to say of the two get TX. The design sold me and the biggest downfall from the T is the battery size, but that's cancelled out by the fact the battery is removable. No brainer. Hence why I have a TX
--
Posted: 2012-11-13 11:59:20
Edit : Quote

randomuser Posts: > 500


On 2012-11-13 11:59:20, Ricky D wrote:
@randomuser I'm not sure many people in the forum here have tried both, I haven't, but I'm going to say of the two get TX. The design sold me and the biggest downfall from the T is the battery size, but that's cancelled out by the fact the battery is removable. No brainer. Hence why I have a TX



Thanks Ricky. What about development for TX ? Do ROMs for T work on TX ? Also I read a review of TX and the reviewer mentioned the build quality of the TX is very poor. Is that true ?
--
Posted: 2012-11-13 12:07:07
Edit : Quote

thejosetree Posts: 59

as a owner of Xperia TX I can say that the design is nice, but the back cover creaks on one side.
--
Posted: 2012-11-13 13:00:28
Edit : Quote

sambouka Posts: 260

I have been using the T for about a month now.


I can say that it has the best battery ever for a Sony Android phone, and I've used a lot (Arc, Arc S, Play, S, Ion etc)

I have copied some screeshots where you can see that as an average:

- The battery lasted for more than 2 days
- Standby time is ridiculously high
- 3G+ on, Wifi from time to time, web browsing, more than 2 hours of screen ON, more than 1 hour of video playback on youtube, 20 to 40 minutes of talktime AND Gmail / Whatsapp Sync always On.






[ This Message was edited by: sambouka on 2012-11-13 12:37 ]

--
Posted: 2012-11-13 13:36:41
Edit : Quote

randomuser Posts: > 500

TX guys, do you get battery performance like sambouka ?
--
Posted: 2012-11-13 13:45:09
Edit : Quote

justus333 Posts: 163

I have no idea how you get to those dream values.
Mine lasts about a day if used normally. Of course I do the casual gaming which sucks up a lot of battery. But even without gaming I never got over 24 hrs of usage.
--
Posted: 2012-11-13 13:47:24
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 858687 ... 197198199>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home