>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2008
Bookmark topic
On 2008-05-08 01:30:51, BobaFett wrote:
that slider at the cam looks very cheap... on some way not an se solution
I have to agree with you on this one. However i still hope this will be rectified in production version.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:29:22
Edit :
Quote
I can't tell if the cam lens slider looks the way it does because of bad quality build, the fact it's a proto, or bad jpeg compression.
In its defense, the slider mechanism looks great on the video captures m-one sharpened.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:40:37
Edit :
Quote
In my opinion the whole back looks cheap, totally different from the front.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:42:54
Edit :
Quote
The back looks to be made of silver plastic, not metal. Any comments?
I though it was supposed to be made out of "premium materials".
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:44:18
Edit :
Quote
some prototypes had metal in the back...this one does not look like it...maybe they want to make it less expensive than older P series...
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:45:31
Edit :
Quote
It sort of looks metal-y. I don't know. As long as it's substantial.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:49:29
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-08 13:09:16, Robis wrote:
On 2008-05-08 09:09:48, n3o wrote:
hmmmmmmmmm
[ This Message was edited by: n3o on 2008-05-08 08:10 ]
I would like to know too
I also wanted to ask the same question, and I don't believe it's a screen protector. In my opinion, it's too thick to be, and it seems to be built-in stuff.
Fake mobile pictured?
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 15:50:55
Edit :
Quote
What??? Man...this is real, period. And that can only be a screen protector. The guy that posted the photos is probably someone from Vodafone UK that is already testing the phone.
I donīget why there is always some guy shouting "fake" to everything, even when the photos are clearly real...
_________________
P1i + M24gb + hbh ds970
uiqblog.com
[ This Message was edited by: ares on 2008-05-08 15:05 ]
[ This Message was edited by: ares on 2008-05-08 15:05 ]
[ This Message was edited by: ares on 2008-05-08 15:06 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 16:04:25
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-08 16:04:25, ares wrote:
I donīget why there is always some guy shouting "fake" to everything, even when the photos are clearly real...
Ditto. I know shouting "FAKE!" is the cool thing to do nowadays, but it's easy to tell what is PhotoShopped and what isn't...and this isn't.
And even if it were, it's not like this is the first time we've seen the phone. It matches up exactly with what we know to be true.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 16:11:57
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-08 15:50:55, taikira wrote:
On 2008-05-08 13:09:16, Robis wrote:
On 2008-05-08 09:09:48, n3o wrote:
hmmmmmmmmm
[ This Message was edited by: n3o on 2008-05-08 08:10 ]
I would like to know too
I also wanted to ask the same question, and I don't believe it's a screen protector. In my opinion, it's too thick to be, and it seems to be built-in stuff.
Fake mobile pictured?
I think you are getting hung up on the term "screen protector." Its not an aftermarket screen protector that you buy to protect the screen during use. It is what SE includes in the packaging to protect the screen during shipping. Its meant to be removed before you start using the phone. All phones are shipped with these plastic sheets.
In fact, seeing this makes the validity of these pictures that much more convincing and makes me believe this is a unit that SE actually put in a box ready to be sold or shipped to someone.
--
Posted: 2008-05-08 16:13:47
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked