>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> SE And 16M Displays
Bookmark topic
trust me, its a very good reason to have suvh displays, when mobile technology turned more in the muti media direction. just think of the big mp cams, videos, watching tv.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 12:07:02
Edit :
Quote
So by that formula, the 1.9" screen of the W880i is the sharpest of them all, although too small for some.
Is that not right? It also has a QVGA screen.
I think the best screen would be a VGA or WVGA with 16 million colours.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 12:09:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-10 12:07:02, BobaFett wrote:
trust me, its a very good reason to have suvh displays, when mobile technology turned more in the muti media direction. just think of the big mp cams, videos, watching tv.
I think on cam phones a 256 screens is decent. And will only advise 16 mill display on DVBH handsets. Not really now. SO even if the K850 doesnt have a 16 mill screens its not the end of the world, besides SE did anounce a WEGA/Bravia phone right? That should be DVBH and should definately have a 16 mill screen.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 12:12:57
Edit :
Quote
of course its not the end of the world, but some se fones would have really deserved it. of course u can enjoy the pix u made with your fone with a descent cam, so if k850 would be launched with a 16m screen, that would be a real succesor
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 12:26:13
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-05-10 12:26:13, BobaFett wrote:
of course its not the end of the world, but some se fones would have really deserved it. of course u can enjoy the pix u made with your fone with a descent cam, so if k850 would be launched with a 16m screen, that would be a real succesor
Yip actually the K-series was always first with new screens so I guess the K850 WILL have a 16 mill screen and obviously to be coupled with a 5MP cam makes better sense.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 12:30:14
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
goldenface wrote:
So by that formula, the 1.9" screen of the W880i is the sharpest of them all,
sharpness don't depend on the size of screen. a 320x240 & 1.9" and a 320x240 & 2.6" of same color would contain exactlly the same information. but in the bigger screen, the pixel size would be large, so you get a feeling of a blurt pic. so you 'may' say that it looses it's sharpness. but a big screen has its advantages also.
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 12:30:00
Edit :
Quote
But as has been said before, the qvga 1.9" screen has more pixels per square inch than a qvga 2.6" screen, so really it should be sharper to the human eye.
The only way the 2.6" screen would be as sharp would be if it had the same amount of pixels per square inch.
The P990i with the same amout of pixels per square inch would be immense.
_________________
The UK's Best Selling Phones
P990i + BT30Q
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2007-05-10 11:50 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 12:47:02
Edit :
Quote
so what would you people prefer? A K850 with 16million screen and QVGA res, or a K850 with 256K and 352x418 res screen(same as N80 res)
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 12:59:50
Edit :
Quote
well, at least n80 way would be fine imo, if se still done wanna use the 16m screen... its time for bit change
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 13:09:46
Edit :
Quote
16m colors makes a difference when you view photo/video. There is no point of having 16m colors on a tiny 1.9inch screen as you cannot have any enjoyment watching the photo/video on such small screen anyway.
786KBR
I have looked at my friend's N73. It doesnt seem to have a protective screen (part of the casing). Unless I am mistaken
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2007-05-10 12:53 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-10 13:50:14
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
