>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> no 16M yet? its 2008!
Bookmark topic
Here is the original followed by examples on the A1200, N95 8Gb and K850i:
A1200 and N95:
N95 and K850i:
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 10:13:49
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-02-15 08:41:07, DarkKrypt wrote:
put that image on your phone now...
tell me what you see
lol
Yes, I see like 18 bit ?
Ok , try this pictures in phone:
65536:
262144:
16 M
I can't see different b/w 262144 and 16 M on phone, can you see ?
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 11:11:28
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-02-15 10:13:49, kenoby wrote:
Here is the original followed by examples on the A1200, N95 8Gb and K850i:
A1200 and N95:
N95 and K850i:
well that proves how dull K850's screen is. i'm sorry if you cant point out the difference, maybe you have low standards with these things and probably have like a 21'' CRT TV at home too. Not I though, i can spot the difference pretty easily.
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 12:43:22
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-02-15 12:43:22, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-15 10:13:49, kenoby wrote:
Here is the original followed by examples on the A1200, N95 8Gb and K850i:
A1200 and N95:
N95 and K850i:
well that proves how dull K850's screen is. i'm sorry if you cant point out the difference, maybe you have low standards with these things and probably have like a 21'' CRT TV at home too. Not I though, i can spot the difference pretty easily.
I envy you
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 12:52:53
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-02-15 07:38:47, islandprd wrote:
I kinda agree that 16M is no biggie. I have N95 8 and I often amazed how poor the same photo looks on its screen compare to S500. Yet many people brush off S500 completely.
dont forget, that the n95 screen res is really crap, compared to other nokia devices
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 13:09:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-02-15 12:43:22, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-15 10:13:49, kenoby wrote:
Here is the original followed by examples on the A1200, N95 8Gb and K850i:
A1200 and N95:
N95 and K850i:
well that proves how dull K850's screen is. i'm sorry if you cant point out the difference, maybe you have low standards with these things and probably have like a 21'' CRT TV at home too. Not I though, i can spot the difference pretty easily.
Kenoby please take pictures with ample light as the k850 has a light sensor in front and will adjust brightness automatically in different lighting situations. As for the picture I see, it will automatically dim its display programmed by the phone.
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 14:00:01
Edit :
Quote
@ tai, here are two more. The fact is it is hard to get a proper photo of the screen. However, this I upload for your request, you will see they are different:
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 15:25:20
Edit :
Quote
@bobafet
LOL, i just joking, my point is the colour between 16m and 262k is hard to see their difference.
Picture above show the difference between 16m, 262k, 65k, 4k, and yes, i can see difference between 16m and 262, but it really hard, i must get my eye closer and focus to monitor to notice it diffence.
Yeah, but display quality cant judged only by how much it can display colour, but LCD quality too, most of us ever see display comparison (for example
www.mobile-review.com) , same colour, same display type, same resolution but difference result.
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 16:02:36
Edit :
Quote
Exactly my words. It is quality that counts.
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 16:19:06
Edit :
Quote
Yep, that's what I've been saying all along as well. It's the same with megapixels - it's got nothing to do with that. Neither does colours have much to do with the quality of the display. K850 kicks arse in terms of display quality,.
--
Posted: 2008-02-15 16:22:33
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
