Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : K800 vs C902 pictures please
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > K800 vs C902 pictures please Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 91011 ... 151617>

imaticx Posts: 107

hi

i'm back from holiday and i see that thread have six pages but still no direct comparisation of night pictures of k800 vs c902

ok. day pictures wins c902

and somebody was talk that c902 have nothing new. a slim design, no camera slide opener, flash themes, speed....
--
Posted: 2008-08-25 21:56:41
Edit : Quote

DeviLLiciouS Posts: 19


On 2008-08-25 21:56:41, imatic wrote:
hi

i'm back from holiday and i see that thread have six pages but still no direct comparisation of night pictures of k800 vs c902

ok. day pictures wins c902

and somebody was talk that c902 have nothing new. a slim design, no camera slide opener, flash themes, speed....


exactly
--
Posted: 2008-09-03 03:43:48
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

so im back after one week holiday in bannedladesh....lots of sun & drinks

so i grabbed my friends k800 and took 8 pics with k800 and C902. (and please, dont start with "did you hold the camera still"...of course i did).
the problem is,(its no problem, its more fact) that of all 8 pics with k800, 4 became good, 2 got very blurred and 2 became just ok. (now i mean the focus), with C902 all 8 pics (belive or not) became sharp(normal).

im sitting right now with my girlfriends mobile broadband, so im uppload full size later, have fiber at home (it took ages to just upload this 1024 x 768 pics)

k800 low light
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

c902 low light
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

k800 cigg
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

c902 cigg
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

k800 roses
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

c902 roses
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

k800 close up


c902 close up


k800
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

c902
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic


_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-09 18:51 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-09 18:53:33
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500

Looks like there's a halo around bright out-of-focus objects in shots from your friend's K800, almost like there's a fingerprint on the lens. Not at all of the same quality as of the shots in Esato's gallery.
--
Posted: 2008-09-09 19:04:38
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

???? here we go.

its not about smudge lens, its about accurate focus in less light.

compare the ones whos sharp instead.....(the only point K800 was(is) better on, is less noise in full size pictures)... everything else there is C902 little better. focus, colors, sharpness, details, etc.

also remember that this pics is shoot in early evening, which test the cameras more optimal then full sunshine.....
(c902 larger sensor handle less light in a better way, if it had been full sunshine, they had been more similar....


edit.. i will also say that ALL k800 pictures look sharp on the mobile screen, but not on the laptop screen.

_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)





[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-09 19:41 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-09 19:13:07
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500


On 2008-09-09 19:13:07, plankgatan wrote:
???? here we go.

Sorry, I will refrain from posting my opinion in the future, unless of course I have something nice to say about your photos. Happy?
--
Posted: 2008-09-09 19:20:04
Edit : Quote

adnansanni Posts: > 500

@plankgatan:
How was your Holiday? Bannedladesh sound likes Bangladesh. Are you carrying your phone in iPod Sock?

[ This Message was edited by: adnansanni on 2008-09-09 18:53 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-09 19:42:32
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

if my K800 would do such poor photos I would get rid of it immediately. of course I understand that if somebody want to shot weak photos then it's not a big problem (as we can see). test result 0/10

one more thing, you're skilled photographer right? what is wrong in first 2 pics? tip: it's something about light metering. identical scene? hmm, with strange coincidence C902 had better conditions than K800

moderators
what is the future of this thread? I don't see anybody who can post credible test of K800 and C902. maybe it's better to lock it before next 'too much words'?
--
Posted: 2008-09-10 10:03:15
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500


On 2008-09-10 10:03:15, Raiderski wrote:

moderators
what is the future of this thread? I don't see anybody who can post credible test of K800 and C902. maybe it's better to lock it before next 'too much words'?



"credible tests"...............thats suppose to funny ?????

read what i write, this pictures is taken in less light (evening), i can guarantee that even other k800 will behave like this in non optimal light.
(i can also guarantee that the camera didnt have smudge on the lens....hhmmm)

i did this test JUST to show the difference in smaller light-conditions. (everyone know that k800 and many other phones take good pics in perfect sunshine... im not interested of that here)


C902 handle less light better.....and thats my point here...nothing else

_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-10 10:28 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-10 11:17:01
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

even at evening my photos without any tricks are much better than this from your friend's K800. I don't like them at all

I will try to spare people next barren discussion between us

_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-09-10 10:31 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-10 11:28:21
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 91011 ... 151617>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home