>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> New NOKIA N86 camera 8 megapixeles
Bookmark topic
On 2009-03-30 16:51:47, plankgatan wrote:
well, Innov8 produce good pics,..but i think c905 is better then renoir.
besides, N86 will wipe all this phones especially indoor, lowlight (and thats what i talk about mostly...yes)...think Renoir and some other high end phones is quite bad lowlight or indoor.
In one of the more reliable shootout the Renoir came first, and this comparison was made by gsmarena...have you ever dreamed the reason?
We all know yours very strange and variable preferences (ask to Abu..), if you want great shots in lowlight get the i-mobile 902 or a k800 with Raiderski cam. driver.
Renoir is way better than C905, except only for the xenon flash, if it’s horrible (as you wrote before editing) in lowlight and indoor pics (strangely they have rated in low light 5 the Renoir, 4 the Innov8, and 2 the C905) what can we say about your crappy lowlight shots? That you live in a fairy tale?
--
Posted: 2009-03-30 18:13:50
Edit :
Quote
c'mon man the N86 has the most most advanced and innovative camera on a phone with variable aperture and wide lens and will beat every phone so stop sayng that the k800,i-mobile,renoir or innov8 is better
--
Posted: 2009-03-30 18:27:48
Edit :
Quote
Only on paper, we’ll see if it will be better than I-mobile on low light or than Renoir and Innov8 in daylight. Looking the pics available i think it will not.
--
Posted: 2009-03-30 18:38:51
Edit :
Quote
those pics are posted from early prototypes,so it's that relevant remember how the first C905 pics where and how they are now
--
Posted: 2009-03-30 18:41:57
Edit :
Quote
Actually the C905 pics were better in the latter prototype stages.
--
Posted: 2009-03-30 18:43:10
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-30 18:43:10, se_dude wrote:
Actually the C905 pics were better in the latter prototype stages.
Early C905 pics were pretty dreadful looking, looked like they put tint over the camera lens.
[ This Message was edited by: driftmania on 2009-03-30 19:31 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-30 20:29:15
Edit :
Quote
Thats coz the sensor was the different. The prototypes with the current sensor had brilliant quality.
--
Posted: 2009-03-31 04:11:43
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-31 04:11:43, se_dude wrote:
Thats coz the sensor was the different. The prototypes with the current sensor had brilliant quality.
Then that means it was an UPDATED prototype. Those pics from the N86 were from an EARLY prototype, get what I'm saying?
--
Posted: 2009-03-31 05:41:32
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-30 16:51:47, plankgatan wrote:
well, Innov8 produce good pics,..but i think c905 is better then renoir.
besides, N86 will wipe all this phones especially indoor, lowlight (and thats what i talk about mostly...yes)...think Renoir and some other high end phones is quite bad lowlight or indoor.
proof:
N86 28mm lens...(can inhale more light and gives much better quality)
Exposure time+low iso(or not) and post-processing... Just this padawan... Nothing "spectacular".
--
Posted: 2009-03-31 08:11:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-30 18:38:51, -PERFECT- wrote:
Only on paper, we’ll see if it will be better than I-mobile on low light or than Renoir and Innov8 in daylight. Looking the pics available i think it will not.
Not directly solely to you or to Radu_91.
WHY on EARTH does EVERY phone conversation on these boards HAVE to be about WHICH camera component is better than the other from various SE phones vs the competition?!
Does anyone actually USE the camera MORE than making phone calls, sending MMS/SMS or browsing the web?! SERIOUSLY!!
The arguement about which phone not released YET has a better camera than a 2yr old phone is getting REALLY old, childish and long in the tooth. Sorry but it is.
BOTH cameras are quite capable and for everyone to knit pick about which reders Red/Purple (5 tones + or - ) better than the other when not 1 of those participating in the rebuttal are developing pictures professionally or for a job for a living or for an actual project to be launched into the public place besides a forum is getting really tiring. Sure I want quality just as much as the last guy. I complain when even summer sun pictures taking on my first Nokia E71-2 (NAM) was obviously rendering purple fringing (and destroying the quality and more so the enjoyment of my pictures). I enjoyed the pictures taking by my long gone & treasured W810i and the quality was up to snuff with the K790a I used after it, better than the BB 8100 Pearl immediately after it, and BETTER than the K850i. I complained about the picture quality on the K850i over time because the quality was subpar or only seldomly equal to that of my W810i; although it was 3yrs after the W810 was released. I forgave the K850i for its subpar pictures due to the video quality much improved.
SO ... unless you've USED the N86's camera and SAVED the pictures to post - stop complaining about it or raising it on a pedestal as its a PRE-PRODUCTION and any assessment is premature until production units ship! I don't care if its an SE, Samsung, or LG, or other manufacturer ... apply the same principles please without beginning to sound asinine. If the camera can do HD video recording but only last 1.5hrs ... then having a rebuttal on its implementation or usefulness makes sense since the battery life will be a concern under 2000mAh.
--
Posted: 2009-03-31 08:22:40
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
