>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Sony Ericsson X10 Official Thread
Bookmark topic
I''l add something to your post.
The first thing - if you read about human eye, its sensitivity and so on you can find out that 16.7mil of colors is marketing. This was proven and it's obvious.
The other thing is far more important. If someone doesn't know LCD works this way:
- there is source of light under the crystals and there are color filters over crystals. For each pixel there are 3 crystals (with red, green, blue filters over them). To create 262k of colors you have to give certain amount of power to each pixel. To create 16.7mil of colors you have to give MORE power to each pixel than for 262k. This math is simple. More power equals more battery drain.
So - If there is no difference for human eye when using 262k or 16.7mil and 16.7mil drains more battery which one do you choose?
+12 Tomasz.luch
I TOTALLY AGREE
Edit: I think we should stop talking about the screen... There are many remaining questions (is there an equalizer? does it have xvid support?)
[ This Message was edited by: XPHCTOC on 2009-11-03 11:42 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:41:44
Edit :
Quote
is this the iphone killer? *sarcasm*
great hardware................................... thats all i can say.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:42:22
Edit :
Quote
AMOLED is not such a deal breaker for me and nor is the amount of colours as long as it exceeds 65k.
In a display with that high resolution, 65k is not enough because you clearly see a more obvious colour transition but having four times as much as SEXperia X1 makes a big difference in terms of smooth colour transition.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:43:54
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-03 12:42:22, iqtidar wrote:
is this the iphone killer? *sarcasm*
great hardware................................... thats all i can say.
Seriously..is this looking like iphone killer to you ??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ytEOOTGtIo
Soooo slow!
[ This Message was edited by: sealover94 on 2009-11-03 11:51 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:45:04
Edit :
Quote
Back to discussion.
I am really dissapointed. And its not about X10. Its about company doing the same mistake again. Showing device in alpha stage. Without finished and polished software.
This device is awesome and I am sure after optimization it will do great in terms of response times.
I know its marketing thing. Motorola showed their device, time is running out and so on but... showing unfinished product is not good way of stealing Motorolas thunder...
I am eagerly waiting for updates in dev paper, for new leaked movies showing optimized software and for price information
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:47:28
Edit :
Quote
@Iqtidar: Two things are missing bigger internal memory and the multitouch "gadget"*. It will be a serious competitor for sure.
*I cannot say multitouch changed my life (I use two computers with multitouch capabilities and it's clearly a gadget, only a gadget).
That's funny to play with google earth with two fingers that's all! But I can do exactly the same thing by double tapping.
@Tomasz.luch: they have made exactly the same mistake with an alpha X1 at 2008 MWC...
@sealover: that's an early prototype! And I would like to make a precision: the donut under UX is VERY FAST (you can see how fast the browser is). They need to improve their UX.
[ This Message was edited by: XPHCTOC on 2009-11-03 11:55 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:49:51
Edit :
Quote
I'm sure the speed will be fixed and optimized before the official release. I really like that phone. I'm not sure how many colours does the screen have - 16millions or 262k.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:53:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-03 12:49:51, XPHCTOC wrote:
@Iqtidar: Two things are missing bigger internal memory and the multitouch "gadget"*. It will be a serious competitor for sure.
*I cannot say multitouch changed my life (I use two computers with multitouch capabilities and it's clearly a gadget, only a gadget).
That's funny to play with google earth with two fingers that's all! But I can do exactly the same thing by double tapping.
Edit: they have made exactly the same mistake with an alpha X1 at 2008 MWC...
[ This Message was edited by: XPHCTOC on 2009-11-03 11:51 ]
@Xristo (prepei na to paradextoume) this is not the device we are all expexted.. and i understand some people being angry with me here..
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:53:41
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-11-03 12:47:28, tomasz.luch wrote:
Back to discussion.
I am really dissapointed. And its not about X10. Its about company doing the same mistake again. Showing device in alpha stage. Without finished and polished software.
This device is awesome and I am sure after optimization it will do great in terms of response times.
I know its marketing thing. Motorola showed their device, time is running out and so on but... showing unfinished product is not good way of stealing Motorolas thunder...
I am eagerly waiting for updates in dev paper, for new leaked movies showing optimized software and for price information
agree. SE really did a misstake showing it in an alpha-state. For people like me it doesnt matter, I know it will be fixed and im still gonna buy it (love it!). But all the n00bs are now complaining about the laggy interface and how SE always f**k it up. Makes me sad that SE did such a poor job presenting this wonderful device
about price, the swedish site "mobil" said 6000sek, a little less than 600euros.
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:55:04
Edit :
Quote
Might I add that the prototype handsets don't rely on the GPU power of the Snapdragon chipset? Currently, everything is being rendered by the 1 GHz CPU. Anyone with just the slightest bit of computer knowledge will tell you that CPU's suck at rendering graphics, so the CPU in the X10 is actually doing quite a good job already. It'll be much improved once they transfer the calculations to the GPU.
Just wait for it to get announced. More info will be available there.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2009-11-03 11:57 ]
--
Posted: 2009-11-03 12:55:36
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
