>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Android
> Sony Xperia Z1
Bookmark topic
On 2013-09-05 01:11:43, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-09-05 01:06:16, Ambivalent_ wrote:
Still pictures and low light performance seems awesome, pictures in motion are bad.
Great find man!
Now let's dig up that
1080p@60 fps video recording ability!
[ This Message was edited by: Ambivalent_ on 2013-09-05 00:06 ]
It is in the white paper. 1080p video recording. 1080p is 60 fps and 1080i is 30 fps.
http://developer.sonymobile.com/downloads/whitepapers/
You're wrong. p stands for progressive while i for interlaced. It has nothing to do with fps as progressive can be 30 60 even 120 fps, doesn't matter. interlaced is usually at least 50fps.
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 01:44:27
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-09-05 01:44:27, admad wrote:
On 2013-09-05 01:11:43, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-09-05 01:06:16, Ambivalent_ wrote:
Still pictures and low light performance seems awesome, pictures in motion are bad.
Great find man!
Now let's dig up that
1080p@60 fps video recording ability!
[ This Message was edited by: Ambivalent_ on 2013-09-05 00:06 ]
It is in the white paper. 1080p video recording. 1080p is 60 fps and 1080i is 30 fps.
http://developer.sonymobile.com/downloads/whitepapers/
You're wrong. p stands for progressive while i for interlaced. It has nothing to do with fps as progressive can be 30 60 even 120 fps, doesn't matter. interlaced is usually at least 50fps.
@amad; I would agree. For instance, 1080p video games doesn't mean they run in 60 fps (they rarely do, at least on consoles).
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 01:52:26
Edit :
Quote
i think admad is confusing FIELDS per second vs. FRAMES per second.
though in either case, 1080p does not necessarily mean 60fps as it can also be 30fps, which i think is blu-ray standard (not sure).
so there is no real confirmation as to the actual frame rate for video recording. sigh. would be a shame if it can take 30.5 frames at 20mp per second but can't do 60fps at 2mp..
either way, i still love it and the design definitely is beautiful to me. but beauty is in the eye of the beholder
i am shocked king-james isn't drooling though haha..
[ This Message was edited by: moogoo on 2013-09-05 00:56 ]
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 01:53:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-09-05 01:53:33, moogoo wrote:
i think admad is confusing FIELDS per second vs. FRAMES per second.
I don't think amad said anything wrong. P & I are progressive and interlaced and have nothing to do with fps.
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 01:56:30
Edit :
Quote
he said interlaced is at least 50fps.. but in this case fps means fields per second, not frames.
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 02:23:57
Edit :
Quote
In all the reviews and hands on videos and write ups I have seen, not one mentions the 3x zoom, so does this actually exist?
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 02:55:17
Edit :
Quote
i don't think you'll see much of it until there are some actual camera/photo specific reviews. most of what's out right now are hands on quickies.. nothing in depth.
the white paper only talks about 8x digital zoom and the BIONZ processor allowing lossless zoom. no mention of 3x anywhere.. so i guess we'll see
[ This Message was edited by: moogoo on 2013-09-05 01:59 ]
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 02:58:45
Edit :
Quote
It mentions 3x Clear Zoom in this official promo vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blUhgOJXetM#t=27
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 03:16:38
Edit :
Quote
3x Clear image zoom
Shooting from a distance? The 3x Clear image zoom by high resolution sensor and BIONZ™ for mobile’s by-By-pixel super resolution takes you to tele-like, 81 mm optical zoom. The combined higher resolution of Exmor RS™ for mobile and By-pixel super resolution of BIONZ™ for work their magic. Zoom in, and enjoy sharply detailed pictures.
http://www.sonymobile.com/gb/[....]nes/xperia-z1/features/#camera
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 03:23:49
Edit :
Quote
ah.. well there ya go. not the first time the white paper has had mistakes
--
Posted: 2013-09-05 03:28:05
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
