Why does this low iso (40) shot look so strange?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[....]115236/sizes/o/in/photostream/ To much postprocessing again?:(
Higher iso shots look even more ridiculous. Samples from CES looked better than this shot. Maybe, with so amny shooting modes, the result can vary a lot? Oversharpening and chroma noise are gone, but...
and an iso 200 shot
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[....]016247/sizes/o/in/photostream/ I know sensors are getting smaller and smaller, but we don't need that much postprocessing, do we?
[ This Message was edited by: marcink on 2013-02-10 20:40 ]
much better oppo find 5 camera than this another piece of crap sony xperia 13 mp unit. Shame again sony !!!
-- Posted: 2013-02-10 22:03:22 Edit :
Quote
If true, Sony needs to share some of its engineers from the NEX/Alpha/Cybershot division to the Sony Mobile division. It's seriously poor showing if other OEMs are getting better results from Sony's own sensors.
-- Posted: 2013-02-11 00:27:13 Edit :
Quote
