Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Post your pictures (and video) taken with a K700
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post your pictures (and video) taken with a K700
Bookmark topic
two pics with my k700 the first one is on extended and fine quality the second is extended with normal quality can u guys even tell the difference?
extended fine quality
extended normal quality
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 12:53:30
Edit :
Quote
is fine quality meant to be the highest quality?
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 12:57:09
Edit :
Quote
I guess so.... ?
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 12:59:48
Edit :
Quote
heres another 2 lol this time set in 640x480 mode.
this one is normal mode
this one is fine mode
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 13:19:02
Edit :
Quote
Well it would seem there is very little difference?
What's the difference in file size? If any??
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 13:28:22
Edit :
Quote
about 30kb, do u guys take ur pictures on 640x480 or extended and do u use fine or normal quality in the above pic i think fine luks slightly sharper but in others u cant tell, sumtimes i even think normal luks better i dont kno!
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 13:35:45
Edit :
Quote
I normally use 640x480... Extended sometimes makes it look worse... I always use the fine setting, but then i can't really see all that much difference in your pics...
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 13:43:40
Edit :
Quote
the fine seems a little bit sharper to me..... but not a whole lot?
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 13:45:02
Edit :
Quote
u think when it comes to things tht r close fine makes a lil difference see tht drain pipe area it seems less blury in fine and the bricks luk a bit sharper but the distance luks not much different between the two pics
heres one i took with extended and set to fine
[ This Message was edited by: deathstaruk2 on 2004-09-19 13:25 ]
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 13:56:13
Edit :
Quote
heres a pic i took in extended and fine
--
Posted: 2004-09-19 14:24:03
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
