Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 990991992 ... 996997998>

Raiderski Posts: > 500

amnher
just asking, I thought maybe you didn't used W810 because of those 'small' file sizes. I was wrong

yep, I have massive chaos in my PMs... jizzz I need the secretary! uhmm, do you remember what was the answer?
--
Posted: 2009-05-06 21:13:27
Edit : Quote

amnher Posts: > 500

@ raider


hi
sorry for late reply!

Is it true that other's say that more size more details? lets say same scene same setting

well, yes and no. we are talking about 2MP camera in which details level are limited by weak hardware. +/- 100kb is not really important. you shouldn't pay much attention on file size because most of details above 700kb are not real details but only so callled 'details' formed during compression


Just want to ask, what's supopose to be the average size for w810i compression which is ideal. Lets say a complex scene like forest
--
Posted: 2009-05-07 10:39:25
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

size strongly depends on scene but not only and there's no rule for this. the forest is complex scene, even if file size will be ~800kb this doesn't mean it is saved in great quality. huge amount of details can move jpeg compression process from ~90% to ~75% quality while any other picture with less complex scene can be saved in 90% quality and file size will be 500kb or less
--
Posted: 2009-05-07 12:09:42
Edit : Quote

amnher Posts: > 500

I see then about the time taken. I see sarmad tooks about 15sec with 2s shutter speed time while in super driver same shutter speed 2s but only taken at 10 sec. does it mean super driver has less exposure? sf6.5 tooks about 5-7sec
--
Posted: 2009-05-07 14:34:36
Edit : Quote

hillgx Posts: 46

Sf v6.5






[ This Message was edited by: hillgx on 2009-05-07 16:49 ]

--
Posted: 2009-05-07 17:46:23
Edit : Quote

GIANGOX Posts: 18










--
Posted: 2009-05-07 21:36:48
Edit : Quote

Raiderski Posts: > 500

amnher
nope, real exposure time is the same in these drivers
--
Posted: 2009-05-08 08:49:46
Edit : Quote

amnher Posts: > 500

Then whats the effect? I mean super driver takes 10s while sarmad takes 15s? and sf5.6 takes 5s?
--
Posted: 2009-05-08 14:20:18
Edit : Quote

amnher Posts: > 500

Enhance Night Mode test
Taken at a very dark place with FLASH as the only light
SF6.5
ENM ON
5/6/09 update

For EXIF
http://i642.photobucket.com/albums/uu147/amnher/SFDSC03002.jpg

Super Driver 6.7.2
ENM on Fine mode

For EXIF
http://i642.photobucket.com/albums/uu147/amnher/RADSC03001.jpg

Sarmad 6.0
ENM ON

For EXIF
http://i642.photobucket.com/albums/uu147/amnher/SARDSC03003.jpg

All are taken and placed in a table to avoid blur

Notice the ISO and shuter speed
the time needed was, sf at 5-7sec, raider at 8-0sec then ssarmad at 15sec
[ This Message was edited by: amnher on 2009-05-13 04:04 ]

--
Posted: 2009-05-13 02:31:43
Edit : Quote

hillgx Posts: 46

Lantern Fly




--
Posted: 2009-05-13 11:01:26
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 990991992 ... 996997998>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home