News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Regional > Americas > USA: AT&T and GSM 850 Bookmark topic

I know that lots of new GSM operators in USA work only at GSM 850. But the following question is only about AT&T that operates both at GSM 1900 and GSM 850.

QUESTION: whether there are any places in USA where AT&T operates
only at GSM 850? Or is it mainly GSM 850 + GSM 1900 together?

--
Posted: 2005-10-25 11:01:18
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2005-10-25 11:01:18, Aivar wrote:
I know that lots of new GSM operators in USA work only at GSM 850. But the following question is only about AT&T that operates both at GSM 1900 and GSM 850.

QUESTION: whether there are any places in USA where AT&T operates
only at GSM 850? Or is it mainly GSM 850 + GSM 1900 together?



As most of us know, AT&T no longer exists. However, I am pretty sure that there are parts of the nation where Cingular operates only on 850MHz.
--
Posted: 2005-10-26 22:09:19
Edit : Quote


at&t is now cingular (blue) and it is 850. as you know, cingular bought AT&T, they merged, now i believe it is only 850. i dont think they use 1900.

[ This Message was edited by: eastcoaststar on 2005-10-26 21:46 ]
--
Posted: 2005-10-26 22:40:15
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2005-10-26 22:40:15, EastCoastStar wrote:
at&t is now cingular (blue) and it is 850. as you know, cingular bought AT&T, they merged, now i believe it is only 850. i dont think they use 1900.

[ This Message was edited by: eastcoaststar on 2005-10-26 21:46 ]


Cingular does use 1900MHz (where it exists/available). I can say this for sure because my K750i is a non 850Mhz phone!
--
Posted: 2005-10-26 22:55:07
Edit : Quote


Yup, I've used my k750 on Cingular also. This message was posted from a K750
--
Posted: 2005-10-26 23:44:54
Edit : Quote


AT&T used both the 1900 and 850 band as did Cingular. However, Cingular bought AT&T and is now pushing more and more the 850 band because of it's higher attenuation (Reaches farther, better quality). In a few instances there is only the 850 band available, but depending where you live and use your phone you might not need the 850 band. But some peeps posted here that they did not get any good reception in some spots with their 1900 band phone and claimed only the 850 band was available. I think this is more true on the east coast of the US.
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 03:13:45
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2005-10-27 03:13:45, Residentevil wrote:
AT&T used both the 1900 and 850 band as did Cingular. However, Cingular bought AT&T and is now pushing more and more the 850 band because of it's higher attenuation (Reaches farther, better quality). In a few instances there is only the 850 band available, but depending where you live and use your phone you might not need the 850 band. But some peeps posted here that they did not get any good reception in some spots with their 1900 band phone and claimed only the 850 band was available. I think this is more true on the east coast of the US.



thank you for clearing it up and exactly, the east coast where im from haha

and @rambalu80 okay, u seem liek you were getting an attitude... its a common mistake. sorry, dang.

you all that are using k750/w800i on Cingular blueANDred (or just cingular), how is your reception?
--
Posted: 2005-10-27 03:37:06
Edit : Quote


Thank you for the answers. So, if I'm planning to travel to the USA, is it better to have a quad-band phone with me? (By the way, as a client of Estonian GSM operator EMT, I may use networks of Cingular/AT&T and T-Mobile.)

But as I know, not a few Americans themsleves are using also "usual" tri-band phones like T68i, T630i, K700, K750i, W800i, P9XX etc. Don't they complain about bad reception and puny coverage?

--
Posted: 2005-10-27 10:41:56
Edit : Quote


no... i nkwo ther t630 and k700 have 850 coverage... if you come with a triband phone, you will probobly be finee
--
Posted: 2005-10-28 00:39:57
Edit : Quote


living in nyc the 850(800) band is much better, my cingular phone gets much better reception in 850 than it does on 1900(t-mobile)
--
Posted: 2005-11-19 04:00:56
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index