Esato Mobile
General discussions : Non mobile discussion : Any 56k'ers ?
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Non mobile discussion > Any 56k'ers ? Bookmark topic
Jim Posts: > 500

Hi all,

I need a small favour; a person on a 56k line with firefox/opera (currently not IE compatible) to test the speed of a site.

Thanks for your time
--
Posted: 2006-02-27 16:16:27
Edit : Quote

axxxr Posts: > 500

I got worried for a second with that thread title!

Sorry i can't help you though!
--
Posted: 2006-02-27 16:18:12
Edit : Quote

Jim Posts: > 500

Why ? Does it also mean something else ?
--
Posted: 2006-02-27 16:20:43
Edit : Quote

axxxr Posts: > 500

no it does'nt ..its just me and and my overactive imagination sorry!
--
Posted: 2006-02-27 16:23:51
Edit : Quote

Cycovision Posts: > 500

No need mate

Web page loading speed tester:

http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/

I've tried it on a couple of my sites, that I've manually worked out the download speeds for previously, and it seems pretty accurate.
--
Posted: 2006-02-27 18:12:33
Edit : Quote

Jim Posts: > 500

Thanks I know the link and it isn't accurate for my case, I got 3 images in png of 6 kb each + CSS of 6 kb + html of 3kb + 2/3 gif for 5 kb + connection to a mysql base and the test give me a time of 1,36 seconds for a 56k wich is allmost impossible.

I suspect the test to count only images declared in the html and not in the css therefore it isn't accurate for me.

I know I should optimize my images but I like to have a reference to have a good quality/speed.
--
Posted: 2006-02-27 18:40:05
Edit : Quote

Cycovision Posts: > 500

No, it gives you an avarage loading time for your entire site taking into account caching of graphics files + includes

Going on what you've said, a first time visitor would be downloading about 40Kb which gives a best case scenario of around 8 seconds. Realistically, it's likely to be 10 - 16 seconds.

Bearing in mind that the browser always downloads the html / php generated / whatever file first, the layout images and CSS sheet will be cached which means you only need to consider the html document filesizes and any additional graphics that they use.

That's how the site came up with 1.4 seconds; your site probably has a uniform layout with little extra graphics content between pages.

The MySQL conection must have been pretty good when you did the test, it can slow things down but that happens on broadband too anyway.

EDIT: Changed the numbers a bit, I can't add up properly



_________________
'He who laughs last, laughs longest. Or didn't get the joke...'

[ This Message was edited by: Cycovision on 2006-02-27 18:05 ]
--
Posted: 2006-02-27 18:59:07
Edit : Quote

Jim Posts: > 500

Allright thanks, it's currently real light in size cause I'm testing it first thus the question in this thread. I'm gonna do my math's for the other pages.
--
Posted: 2006-02-27 19:30:13
Edit : Quote

mcrosser Posts: > 500

I'm on 56K but use IE. suppose I could download firefox to help a fellow test the speeds.
--
Posted: 2006-02-28 06:53:10
Edit : Quote

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home