>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800 review on this site
Bookmark topic
Oooh, maggflodd is bad... Again! Sorry guys, and appreciating apologies to the man who made the effort, really, BUT it's bad, it doesn't belong here, it's incomplete, its maths is wrong, it's way too 'me, me, me...' (not intentionally, I'm sure as a professional translator... Sorry, again!). But really, I wouldn't buy loo roll based on a poorly done review such as that - But, am I totally wrong? Is it just me? Correct me! And still, thanks anyway!
--
Posted: 2006-07-22 21:55:46
Edit :
Quote
Actually I think the review was pretty good. Nice photos of the phone and basically the opposite of what was said above ^ Good job!
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 06:24:41
Edit :
Quote
It was rushed. Too many things were'nt even mentioned or given a glance.
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 09:08:55
Edit :
Quote
Agreed. It's always great to read a review, but I think this one really picked and chose what it wanted to cover, and then did so in a pretty vague manner.
Photos were good, however.
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 09:49:24
Edit :
Quote
Fair enough, but if you want a
concise review, look at this one from
mobique Very long, but covers everything!
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 10:59:40
Edit :
Quote
At one place, he mentioned that he was able to read gmail on the k800, and was impressed by the number of emails he could list in the phone. He never mentioned anything about the phone complaining about certificates while receiving gmails, and obviopusly, he hasn't tried to send an email using the K800 and gmail's SMTP server. I have tried, it doesn't work. The gmail support didn't even bother to answer my query about it, the only thing I have received is an autoreply message that they have received my query.
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 11:06:32
Edit :
Quote
mobile review did the most thorugh review of it. 5 long pages!!
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 11:22:20
Edit :
Quote
@QVGA
mobique's was 6-7 pages long.
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 11:26:40
Edit :
Quote
I like GSM Arena and Mobique for their user friendliness, because they are easy to understand. But when it comes to actually going down in deep detail, noone does it better than mobile review.
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 11:29:48
Edit :
Quote
@QVGA
Actually I prefer the ones given by gsmarena, mobileburn and mobique. I think that they give more of a look at the actual phone, and its features etc. whereas mobile-review's are great for commentary about the phone but it doesn't go specifically into particular phone functions, which is probably due to the fact that he gets prototypes.
Eldar (from mobile-review) also gives a lot of hints in his reviews about upcoming phones from manufacturers which is the main drawcard for me. And the photos are great as well, but the translating ...
--
Posted: 2006-07-23 11:40:09
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
