>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> w810 and his camera
Bookmark topic
Now i'm really in doubt. I've seen the pictures tooked with this fone and are very good ( posted here on ESATO ) . But , the thing is like this : I've read on Phone Arenas review >
http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/readreviews.php?id=1345&page=6
I want to ask especially the people who took pictures with this fone , how are them ? Cool , nice ? like in Esato site ? ... the uploaders of those pictures from this site have made big modifications ? Thanks for any reply.
[ This Message was edited by: maryus51 on 2006-07-27 08:05 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 09:04:47
Edit :
Quote
Its more of a lucky shot. Sometimes you can end up with really good ones, and sometimes really bad ones.
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 09:10:30
Edit :
Quote
If you want to take proper photos go buy a compact digital camera... if you just want the odd snap shot use the phone... phones out at the moment still have a long way to go before they match the capabilities and features of a £150 digital camera.
Pics from w810 come out ok most of the time:
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 10:37:34
Edit :
Quote
I agree with
QVGA. That is my experience too.
You have to try the available camera settings to get the optimal result.
In good light conditions the pictures are normally very good indeed, but in bad light conditions (like in really sunny places or at night) they might be either over- or underexposed.
And don't forget: It's a phone with a camera, not a camera with a phone.
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 10:43:02
Edit :
Quote
if you want a camera with a phone try the k800
... not to much difference in price either
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 10:46:29
Edit :
Quote
W810 cam is ok, i didnt noticed any diff to k750 etc
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 12:58:45
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-27 10:46:29, BlacK Devil wrote:
if you want a camera with a phone try the k800
... not to much difference in price either
still wouldnt class the the K800 as a camera with a phone - not by a long way!!
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 13:21:18
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-27 13:21:18, JJ! wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-07-27 10:46:29, BlacK Devil wrote:
if you want a camera with a phone try the k800
... not to much difference in price either
still wouldnt class the the K800 as a camera with a phone - not by a long way!!
no but it is the closest relative of a camera with a phone
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 13:22:59
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-27 13:21:18, JJ! wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-07-27 10:46:29, BlacK Devil wrote:
if you want a camera with a phone try the k800
... not to much difference in price either
still wouldnt class the the K800 as a camera with a phone - not by a long way!!
It's a sign of how mature the digital camera has become, that even cheap ones (and even the K800 camera) are competent and useful cameras.
A 3mp image will print out at 8x10 just as well as a 35mm negative scanned at 2400dpi. When digital cameras were .3MP, professionals claimed that a 3MP camera would be equal to 35mm film. This is obviously absurd in hindsight, but it shows that what we consider a quality digital camera is somewhat subjective and relative to the status quo.
The K800 is a digital camera with a phone. You could also call it a digital camera with internet access, or a phone with a games console, or a mediaplayer with mass data storage. You can call it which ever way you want, but at the end of the day the K800 is, among other things, a Digital Camera.
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 16:09:14
Edit :
Quote
a digital camera without the basics of optical zoom!!
_________________
JJ! (formerly justy1978) (+6, -0)
[ This Message was edited by: JJ! on 2006-07-27 15:33 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-27 16:33:08
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
