>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Accessories
> 65K TFT Screen for T68
Bookmark topic
Hi.. Does anyone know if there is a third party 65K TFT Screen for T68? Wouldn't it be good if we can just buy the screen and change our T68 to 65K TFT screen. I am hoping someone will come up with this spare parts.
Cheers
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 17:32:00
Edit :
Quote
good answer tom!
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 17:39:00
Edit :
Quote
Hehehe.... If there was such a thing, they wont be using their normal screens... Duh !!
This post was posted from a R520
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 17:48:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2002-10-30 17:32, JD wrote:
Hi.. Does anyone know if there is a third party 65K TFT Screen for T68? Wouldn't it be good if we can just buy the screen and change our T68 to 65K TFT screen. I am hoping someone will come up with this spare parts.
Cheers
Well, I hardly think that 65K TFT would work out well for such a small screen(101*80 pixels), And can't you just imagine what it would do to T68i's excellent battery time....
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 18:00:00
Edit :
Quote
In all cases, replacing the screen will cost a lot of money.
This post was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 18:14:00
Edit :
Quote
.... Thinfilm (TFT) display actually uses less current than a stn one, wich is used in the 68... but it recuires som other hardware other than the display itselves. and the interlace circuit...
but i guess that even thus the size of the display it would do much better with a TfT or even better a OrganicLightDisplay wich is faster lower power consupt and non-pixel
Bst rgds
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 18:21:00
Edit :
Quote
@tcp/ip
I'm far from an expert on the subject, but if a TFT screen uses less current than STN how come TFT screens seems to consume way more power from the battery than a STN screen? Ex; T100's 4K TFT screen vs. S100's 65K STN.
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 18:35:00
Edit :
Quote
gadgetboytom Posts: > 500
Quote:
On 2002-10-30 18:21, tcp/ip wrote:
.... Thinfilm (TFT) display actually uses less current than a stn one, wich is used in the 68...
*****************************************************
but it recuires som other hardware other than the display itselves. and the interlace circuit...
*****************************************************
but i guess that even thus the size of the display it would do much better with a TfT or even better a OrganicLightDisplay wich is faster lower power consupt and non-pixel
Bst rgds
he told you read it
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 18:37:00
Edit :
Quote
@Tom
No, he says a TFT would be better for the battery(from what I understand). And I wanna know why that is... Cause to me it just do not make sense.
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 18:43:00
Edit :
Quote
course STN (Super Twisted Nuonic)Lcd
course STN (Super Twisted Nuonic)Lcdscreens are so-called 'passive matrix' displays. They use a row-and-column select method for each pixel (rather like multiplexing) and for this and other reasons they give a low contrast, dull image. Due to the fact that a whole row or column of pixels is addressed at once, these displays suffer from 'bleeding' or smearing of the displayed image. They also suffer from slow response times - movement is blurred. TFT stands for thin-film transistor, and in practice it means that transistors are actually deposited within the structure of the LCD. One transistor is associated with each individual pixel, and is effectively addressed individually by the driver circuit. Partly because the pixels are turned on and off by their own transistor, a TFT display is brighter, clearer and has a faster response time STN display. Just think some years back when u used TTL (Transistor logic) in digital equipment ! Eg: pc^s instead of c-mos like u use more now.... the powersupplyes vere HUGE!!
--
Posted: 2002-10-30 19:01:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
