>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> sidekick 3
Bookmark topic
Don't supppose anyone will have this phone but...if anyone does how is it? it looks pretty cool. Does anyone have any earlier version of the sidekick? cheers
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 00:50:53
Edit :
Quote
EastCoastStar Posts: > 500
i dont HAVE it, but have played with both, plenty of times. they take some getting used to, but they are in fact decent phones.
they are different, but for the price difference, i would stick with the SK2 for now. once the SK3 comes down in price, i would get it.
the SK3 is a little faster, and can do a little more, so if price isnt an issue, go with the SK3... btw... SK1 sucks
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 02:51:26
Edit :
Quote
pictures?
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 03:11:26
Edit :
Quote
EastCoastStar Posts: > 500
you can google it, or i can take pics next time i hang out with them.
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 03:18:49
Edit :
Quote
ye the sidekick 2 looks quite cool. On ebay you get get coloured vinyl skins to put on them which makes them look really cool. Ye i can't imagine the sidekick 1 being very good lol. Sk 3 though has msn i think, but the sk2 doesnt. But it does seem quite a cool phone.
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 12:24:39
Edit :
Quote
Sidekicks are pants!
IMO!
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 18:13:14
Edit :
Quote
Wat features does the SideKick3 hav?
This message was posted from a W900i
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 18:35:38
Edit :
Quote
not too sure... 1.3 megapixel camera, mp3player, internet browsing is all ii know.
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 19:27:58
Edit :
Quote
1.3 is what really puts me off from it.. It's a pretty cool device and I Was tempted to get it but errrhh I've never had a phone with a better camera than 1.3mp and I think its about time!!
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 19:37:05
Edit :
Quote
true. the sidekick always seems to be one step behid eveything else. when most phones had megapixel this had 0.3 megapixel, no most decent phones aren't below 2 megapixel. But 1.3 is still good seeing as it is a phone..but i agree 2 or 3 megapixels would be better
--
Posted: 2007-01-05 19:50:14
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
