Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Sony Ericsson’s W880 competitive threat to Apple’s iPod
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Sony Ericsson’s W880 competitive threat to Apple’s iPod Bookmark topic
Page12345>

axxxr Posts: > 500

Analysts say Sony Ericsson’s W880 device might pose a competitive threat to Apple’s iPod going forward.

Say Analysts Dresdner Kleinwort in a research note published yesterday, the analysts mention that the appeal of Sony Ericsson as a partner to the distributors/retailers as well as service providers/operators is poised to rise significantly in the upcoming few weeks. Sony Ericsson’s W880 device might pose a competitive threat to Apple’s iPod going forward, provided it is marketed aggressively and priced affordably,the analysts say.


--
Posted: 2007-03-06 18:18:53
Edit : Quote

BobaFett Posts: > 500

i am really not an iphone fan, but it would be the last for me to go for w880, its definitaley a downgrade, even k750 has got more features to offer than that metalic calculator clone... i love it when no name whoevers compare things...
--
Posted: 2007-03-06 18:24:17
Edit : Quote

maggflodd Posts: > 500

I hate the ipod/itunes/i-jobs/iiiiiiiiii... And i-Think currently there's a bit of a back-lash-atmosphere in the gadget-media: vista gets slated, ps3 pisses-off all of Europe, i-phone gets ridiculed re. 3g etc., etc., I'd hope the momentum keeps building so that the big-ones don't get too comfy, and good alternatives get a chance... but, as they say on tv: people, vote with your thumb... Well, a lot of thumbs are up peoples ar**s - that's why they heavily rely on the i-pods scroll wheely thingy...
As to the w880... Will probably take 2 years before it's out in Ireland, so what do I know??? Rubbish - that won't beat the i-pod! The only thing that can beat the i-pod is Jobs' own godcomplex and his arrogant disregard for the reasons why people embraced the i-world in the first place... he believes he's infallible, like some sect-leader.
...is what maggflodd thinks!
--
Posted: 2007-03-06 20:02:14
Edit : Quote

PeterKay Posts: > 500

Personally i'd go for the W880i without doubt.

--
Posted: 2007-03-06 20:05:18
Edit : Quote

Hlcn Twst Posts: > 500

Hang on, let me grab my trusty flamesuit.



The phones may have improved, but they have a long way to go before they match the iPod's clean, easy to use interface. And the intuitiveness and seamlessness of iPod-iTunes integration can't be beat.

In contrast, the app is clumsy and limited, Disc2Phone is a joke, and the USB phone interface inspires only fear. Not to mention memory cost - an 8GB MSDP card (by itself!) costs the same or more than an 8GB iPod Nano.

I bought my W810 to combine the purchase of a new phone and iPod Nano. I now find myself shopping for an iPod Nano + non-music playing phone. The Nano is far and away better than my W810 for loading, navigating, and playing music.

--
Posted: 2007-03-06 20:26:19
Edit : Quote

jcwhite_uk Posts: > 500

The walkman player on my W880i is great for what i use it for. I have 15 albums loaded onto my 1GB stick. I dont wan to carry around a phone and a music player. I also have all my music saved as MP3 so it wont work on an Ipod and i dont really want to go through the hassle and disk space of making them into AAC.
--
Posted: 2007-03-06 22:13:00
Edit : Quote

Coxy Posts: > 500

I never use WMAs but I noticed when I loaded some to my phone that I did not know were WMAs it played them! Something older Walkmans couldnt do.
--
Posted: 2007-03-06 22:14:35
Edit : Quote

Hlcn Twst Posts: > 500

I dont wan to carry around a phone and a music player.


But you still have to carry around headphones... and iPod Nanos and Shuffles are tiny, making them very easy to bring along. Plus, when your phone breaks, how will you listen to music?

I also have all my music saved as MP3 so it wont work on an Ipod and i dont really want to go through the hassle and disk space of making them into AAC.


Since when has any iPod been unable to support MP3?

Audio formats supported: AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), Protected AAC (from iTunes Store), MP3 (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Audible (formats 2, 3 and 4), Apple Lossless, AIFF and WAV

http://www.apple.com/ipod/specs.html
http://www.apple.com/ipodnano/specs.html
http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/specs.html

(Never mind that AAC (protected or not) is superior to MP3, anyway.)

--
Posted: 2007-03-06 22:43:48
Edit : Quote

jcwhite_uk Posts: > 500

My apologies. i was under the impression that the Ipod didnt like MP3's as my friends Ipod didnt recognise them.
I normally have my stereo bluetooth on me for listening to music and for making calls. If I had phone and ipod I would need to have my phone, Bt headset, Ipod and ipod headphones.
--
Posted: 2007-03-06 23:01:35
Edit : Quote

Hlcn Twst Posts: > 500

On 2007-03-06 23:01:35, jcwhite_uk wrote:
My apologies.


No worries. I agree, phones are fine for what they are. Coming from an iPod to a W810, though, I find the iPod does a better job overall with music. My wife just bought a 4GB Nano, and I'm jealous. That's one reason why I might be replacing my W810 with a K790a (and adding my own Nano).

--
Posted: 2007-03-06 23:09:53
Edit : Quote
Page12345>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home