News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Non mobile discussion > Check out number 11 ! ( This ones for you Axxxr ) Bookmark topic

The Secret behind the number 11 - Pretty Chilling

Read to the bottom. Try it out. I did and I got goose
bumps


This is actually really freaky!!

1) New York City has 11 letters
2) Afghanistan has 11 letters.
3) Ramsin Yuseb has 11 letters. (The terrorist who
threatened to destroy the Twin Towers in 1993)
4) George W Bush has 11 letters.

This could be a mere coincidence, but this gets
interesting:
1) New York is the 11th state.
2) The first plane crashing against the Twin Towers was
flight number 11.
3) Flight 11 was carrying 92 passengers. 9 + 2 = 11
4) Flight 77 which also hit Twin Towers, was carrying 65
passengers. 6+5 = 11
5) The tragedy was on September 11, or 9/11 as it is now
known. 9 + 1+ 1 =11
6) The date is equal to the US emergency services
telephone number 911.

9 + 1 + 1 = 11


Sheer coincidence..?! Read on and make up your own mind:


1) The total number of victims inside all the hi-jacked
planes was 254.

2 + 5 + 4 = 11.

2) September 11 is day number 254 of the calendar year.
Again 2 + 5 + 4 = 11.
3) The Madrid bombing took place on 3/11/2004. 3 + 1 +
1 + 2 + 4 = 11.
4) The tragedy of Madrid happened 911 days after the
Twin Towers incident.


Now this is where things get totally eerie:

The most recognized symbol for the US, after the Stars &
Stripes, is the Eagle. The following verse is taken from the Koran, the
Islamic holy book:


"For it is written that a son of Arabia would awaken a
fearsome Eagle. The
wrath of the Eagle would be felt throughout the lands of
Allah while some
of the people trembled in despair still more rejoiced:
for the wrath of the
Eagle cleansed the lands of Allah and there was peace."


That verse is number 9.11 of the Koran.

Unconvinced about all of this Still ..?!

--
Posted: 2007-03-19 20:26:34
Edit : Quote


if you look at enough things to do with 9/11 you will find things with the number 11 in, there are also thousands of facts to do with the attack which dont have 11 in, i dont think there is anything significant at all
--
Posted: 2007-03-19 20:31:00
Edit : Quote


what a pity, that no arabians had to do anything with 9/11.... they was just used to play the bad guys...
--
Posted: 2007-03-19 20:31:44
Edit : Quote


this has been posted a few times and if you google the urban myth pages you'll find that its not all true, for example apparanly there is no such passage in koran and it was 912 days from 9/11 to madrid etc etc

see here

edit: oh yeah, and you forgot the wingdings bit

_________________
Unless I'm very much mistaken...
reviews: i-mate V800 K700

[ This Message was edited by: masseur on 2007-03-19 19:34 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-19 20:33:11
Edit : Quote


Yeh that ones a urban legend, but what about the Number 23?


--
Posted: 2007-03-19 22:51:25
Edit : Quote


If one considers the study of nature in a purely objective scientific
manner, then one must not have anticipation of a particular result as
that would result in a subjective interpretation of observation and
would result in a skew of Truth. Throughout history nature has been
studied both objectively and subjectively with those instruments
available during that "time" period. As a result, observations with
such instruments were interpreted to either mirror current
perceptions and thereby strengthening its condition, or observations
were interpreted that were in total disagreement with current
perceptions of reality resulting in a Paradigm Shift that almost
always is met with resistance by the thinkers that were still
attached to the then accepted "Laws of Reality" of the day.

Of course, this has been written about in depth by Thomas Kuhn in his
1962 book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Therefore, I would
like to introduce a concept of reality that has not been currently
discovered publicly but there seems to consist a considerable amount
of evidence that such concepts of reality have been discovered and
applied. As a person who is seeking to understand the underlying
nature of Truth it seems necessary to investigate these ideas even if
it necessarily disagrees with current perceptions of reality.

As YOU may know mathematics consists of sets of symbols to describe
how other symbols may be translated as a function of a particular set
or sets of symbols as "rules" or "axioms". Such notation as a
description of translation attributes to itself the ability to
describe translations of any particular set of symbols that are
necessarily consistent axiomatic formulations that are logically
consistent and cohesive. However, according to Godel's Incompleteness
Theorem such consistent axiomatic formulations ALWAYS include
undecidable propositions. So one might be able to prove every
statement about symbols within a system by going OUTSIDE the system
in order to come up with new rules and axioms, but by doing so one
will only create a larger system with its own unprovable statements.
So it seems that rational thought can never penetrate to the final
ultimate truth. Therefore, it makes sense that a so-called irrational
thought is first rejected prior to acceptance as rational in order to
transcend perception as a higher understanding of "observable" truths
resulting in a broadening of accepted perception(s) .

There existed many students of Life who observed nature intensely in
order to take from those observations a set of principles that
described movements of physical nature. These individuals either
built upon the existing foundation, destroyed it, or discovered
another. The aim of such was to write down those principles that
described the essence of nature in its entirety. It would be during
the time of Albert Einstein, Kurt Gödel, Neils Bohr, Linus Pauling
among many others that would help build upon and lay the necessary
groundwork, if not all, that might be needed to determine the
symbolism necessary as a language of mathematics to describe the
underlying principles to unify reality in one equation/sentence.

Currently, many "architects" of science have drawn many blueprints as
to what they feel the overall foundation might appear within the
limited observable range of their instruments' perceptions. Such
architects compare what they "see" with the blueprint and have a hard
time telling a window from a door. They assume a door and get a
houseplan that falls apart when built and if they assume a window it
blows up! Now it seems that certain architects have decided not to
rely on the instruments for they know of their limits of perception
and have drawn many blueprints in the hope that one day observation
will fit the plan. The trouble is all of their blueprints were
recently discovered to be exactly the same just on different paper!
Back to square one. This is the current dilemma regarding String
Theory.

Now I would like to go back to the time of Einstein and his discovery
of the Theory of General Relativity. Now within the framework of this
theory it says that "time" is relative. All there is needed as a
measure of it is a reference point. The implications of this idea is
that time is not part of reality but only exists as a subjection
placed within. This idea as time existing as a non-linear concept
changing with respect to an observer was hard to understand but was
eventually accepted as truth when Einstein's equations correctly
predicted the curvature of light passing through an existing
gravitational field. Thus, the idea of the curvature of space-time
was solidified and introduced the concept of time travel.

It would be years later when Richard P. Feynman was attempting to
discover the underlying laws that described the behavior of
elementary particles that he was "forced" to come up with a new type
of mathematical symbolism that described such behavior with a more
accurate formalism. This new notation introduced the concept of a
particle that exists only within one moment of time but may exist
anywhere in space. In essence, this particle's subjective experience
would not feel a passage in time though it had freedom to move in
space. Such particles would be stuck in time, as a loop, and
experience the same passage in space indefinitely!

These theoretical time-loop particles properties have been
investigated and current research seems to confirm that they may
indeed exist. It has been proposed that these particles could be
synthesized but such manifestations require a tremendous amount of
energy and has been considered to be nearly impossible.

However, there seems to consist considerable evidence that time
travel is not only possible but has been discovered and applied. It
seems that Einstein, possibly Von Neumann and others completed the
work that was purported to have been one of Einstein's failures. It
is possible that the Unified Field Theory has been formulated and
applied in secret. It seems that it was discovered that the
existence of humans within the framework of the Unified Field
provided the specific energy necessary to alter space-time via
unstable gravity waves. These gravity waves served as a conduit to
travel within the realms of reality. These conduits could be formed
via a human subject attached to an instrument capable of "tuning"
into his/her unique frequency pattern and maintaining the subject in
a pre-orgasmic state that would utilize an energy that has been
esoterically named the Kundalini energy. Such pre-orgasmic states may
heighten the awareness of the individual such that a conduit/tunnel
would manifest allowing travel through time. It seems that they
traveled both in the past and the future and, by doing so, created a
time-loop. Therefore, it is possible that what we perceive as our
past may be our future and vice-versa.

It is true that such evidence is not true but in the context of
possibility I think investigation might be beneficial into
understanding current conditions. Imagine the implications of such a
possibility. If it is possible to travel through time at will, then
conditions in our perceived past could be changed to alter our
perceived future and could be done over and over again. Each change
would be hard to perceive because current perceived histories would
change accordingly. If this is the case, altering recorded history
would not be difficult to accomplish and would confuse the Truth of
history and effectively break it into pieces of pieces of a puzzle
that may require putting it back together again.

So it would not be beyond those capable to set-up coincidences in
order to confuse or strengthen beliefs in certain religious
prophecies.

I thought this concept was interesting and it seems to relate to
those odd coincidences you have pointed out.

For those interested in further investigations, these ideas can be found by searching with the
keywords: Cassiopaean Experiment, Montauk Project, Philadelphia
Experiment.. .......
--
Posted: 2007-03-22 10:33:23
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index